My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 7.15.24
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2024
>
Agenda Packet 7.15.24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:43:11 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HEMA No. 2024-03 – The St. Thomas-Hamilton House (1002 N. French Street) <br />July 15, 2024 <br />Page 8 <br />4 <br />3 <br />8 <br />8 <br />8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources <br />must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken. <br />Standard 8 does not apply, as there are no known archeological resources onsite. <br />9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy <br />historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. <br />The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the <br />historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the <br />integrity of the property and its environment. <br />The project, as conditioned, complies with Standard No. 9. The proposed building <br />alterations will not destroy historic materials, features, or spatial relationships that <br />characterize the property at the building’s primary (south and east) facades. <br />Rather, the proposed alterations will restore the porch to the original conditions by <br />removing a non-original porch enclosure and restoring all existing character- <br />defining features (e.g., existing porch posts, brackets, balustrade, frieze, <br />spandrels, and skirting) to period-correct style. The porch enclosure is known to <br />be a later modification, does not represent a particular style, and does not appear <br />to have taken on any significance in its own right over time. <br />As part of the overall work, the applicant would install concrete pier walls at the <br />porch stairs, which are compatible with the historic porch elements, but that are <br />also differentiated to not create a false sense of history. The work also includes <br />the replacement of non-historic wooden railings. While the existing porch stoop <br />railings were replaced using turned wood balusters, they are not of the same <br />design as the extant historic examples. Moreover, the applicant proposes to install <br />metal handrails and guardrails, simple in form and styling (i.e., no knuckles or <br />twists) and finished in a dark color so that they recede from view, at all secondary <br />entrances, as well as staircases to upper level. The overall simplistic design along <br />with use of distinct materials will ensure that all alterations will be compatible with <br />the historic building. Specifically, the concrete piers and metal railings will be <br />differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, <br />features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the <br />property and its environment. <br />10.New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such <br />a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the <br />historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. <br />The project complies with Standard No. 10. The proposed project, as conditioned, <br />is considered generally reversible, as it does not remove essential aspects of the <br />building’s form and materials. <br /> <br />Historic Resources Commission 145 7/15/2024 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.