My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 7.15.24
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2024
>
Agenda Packet 7.15.24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:43:11 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:40:39 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO <br />GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383 <br />Resolution No. 2024-03 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />to period-correct style, which will blend in with the building and <br />not be considered a conjectural alteration. <br /> <br />iv. The project complies with Standard No. 5. As conditioned, the <br />project complies with Standard No. 5. Distinctive materials, <br />features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of <br />craftsmanship that characterize the property will be <br />preserved. The majority of the project does not propose to <br />remove character-defining features or materials/finishes <br />along any façade. Although two of the three doors along the <br />south and east elevation are not original, they are presumed <br />to have been relocated from another location in the house <br />when later additions occurred, considering that they both <br />match the one original primary entry door. The historic <br />assessment further notes that the additional entrance <br />openings, occurred prior to the historic designatio n of the <br />neighborhood, and that they are now essential to the <br />contemporary use of the property. Therefore, the applicant <br />proposes to retain and restore the doors to a period -correct <br />style, in keeping with this standard. <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, the overall work also includes the <br />replacement of existing (non-historic) wooden railings. These <br />porch stoop railings were replaced using turned wood <br />balusters, and are not of the same design as the extant <br />historic examples, creating a false sense of history, <br />diminishing the overall historic character of the property. <br />These railings are not an example of a distinctive features, <br />finishes, or construction techniques, or examples of <br />craftsmanship that characterize a property. Therefore, <br />removal of these railings would not be in conflict with this <br />standard. <br /> <br />v. The project complies with Standard No. 6. All character- <br />defining features (e.g., existing porch posts, brackets, <br />balustrade, frieze, spandrels, and skirting) will be retained and <br />restored to period-correct style. The porch enclosure only <br />partially removed sections of the original frieze and spandrels. <br />Moreover, the existing turned porch posts, bases, capitals and <br />brackets appear to be original the home, as well as the <br />existing turned balusters. Lastly, the applicant p roposes to <br />restore the basement vent screens to match existing block <br />fascia at wrap-around porch. All exterior repairs will be done <br />using in-kind materials and exterior siding too deteriorated to <br />repair will be replaced with custom-mill siding to match original <br />in-kind. Therefore, replacement of missing features will be <br /> <br />Historic Resources Commission 153 7/15/2024 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.