My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 LESS -THAN -SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS <br />WITH MITIGATION INCORPORATED <br />for the subsurface parking garage. The sensitivity for potential buried prehistoric archaeological <br />sites at the Project site is considered low at the surface and near surface due to past disturbances; <br />however, the sensitivity increases in these undisturbed soils. Therefore, implementation of GPU <br />PEIR MM CUL-6 would require monitoring during all ground -disturbing construction activity and <br />pre -construction activities within previously undisturbed soils by a qualified archaeologist and a <br />Native American monitor, worker training, and procedures in case of a find. In addition, Project - <br />Specific MM TCR- 1 through MM TCR-5 are proposed for implementation as requested by the <br />Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation and the Juaneno Band of Mission Indians, <br />Acjachemen Nation-Belardes, to require procedures for Native American monitoring and to avoid <br />potential impacts to tribal cultural resources that may be unearthed from project construction <br />activities. Project -Specific MM TCR-6 is proposed for resource identification, dispute resolution, <br />and final disposition in the event of an unanticipated discovery of a tribal cultural resource. <br />Therefore, Project impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation <br />incorporated. <br />Threshold TCR-2: The Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code <br />Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is <br />geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, <br />sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American <br />tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion <br />and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria <br />set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In <br />applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code <br />Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the <br />resource to a California Native American tribe, with the implementation <br />of mitigation. <br />Findings: The City finds that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, <br />the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified <br />in the Final Supplemental EIR. Specifically, the City finds that GPU PEIR MM CUL-6 and Project - <br />Specific MM TCR-1 through MM TCR-6 (listed previously) shall be implemented to reduce <br />potentially significant tribal cultural resource impacts resulting from the Project. (Final <br />Supplemental EIR, p. 3-9 — 3-11.) <br />Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement regulatory requirements RR TCR-1 <br />through RR CUL-1 (listed above). (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.14-4.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: The rationale and facts supporting the above finding are fully <br />developed in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural Resources, pages 4.14-13 through 4.14-14 of the Draft <br />Supplemental EIR and in Chapter 3, Revisions to the Draft Supplemental EIR, of the Final <br />Supplemental EIR. The following presents a summary of that rationale: <br />As previously discussed, the Project's Sacred Lands File search yielded negative results and <br />additional research identified no historical or archaeological resources within the Project site and <br />a 0.5-mile radius. The City's consultation with the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />5-20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.