My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Item 28 - Public Hearing - Amendment Application for the Village Santa Ana Specific Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2025 9:35:07 AM
Creation date
9/10/2025 8:39:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
28
Date
9/16/2025
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 10 <br />STATEMENT OF <br />OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS <br />10.1 INTRODUCTION <br />The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification <br />of the Supplemental EIR for proposed The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project (proposed <br />Project or The Village). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the <br />potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, <br />and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those <br />impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the <br />benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts <br />in determining whether or not to approve the proposed Project. In making this determination the <br />City is guided by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of Overriding Considerations, <br />which states: <br />a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, <br />legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide <br />environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks <br />when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, <br />of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the <br />adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." <br />b) When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant <br />effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, <br />the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the <br />final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations <br />shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. <br />c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be <br />included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of <br />determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings <br />required pursuant to Section 15091. <br />In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds <br />that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including <br />considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make <br />infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant <br />unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, <br />technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. <br />Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against the unavoidable <br />adverse impacts associated with the Project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures <br />with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the Project, none of <br />which both meet the Project objectives and are environmentally preferable to the Project for the <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />10-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.