Laserfiche WebLink
4 NO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WITHOUT MITIGATION MEASURES <br />specifically, the GHG plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the Project <br />would comply with the regulations and GHG reduction goals, policies, actions, and strategies <br />outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan, 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's GPU and Climate Action <br />Plan. Consistency with these plans would reduce the impact of the Project's incremental <br />contribution to GHG emissions. Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with any applicable <br />plan, policy, regulation, or recommendation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. <br />Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.5-23 — 4.5-34.) <br />Cumulative Impacts: The Project would not result in cumulative impacts concerning greenhouse <br />aas emissions. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant cumulative impacts <br />concerning greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement <br />regulatory requirements RR GHG-1 through RR GHG-3 and RR GHG-7 (listed above). (Draft <br />Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.5-34 — 4.5-35.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) states that <br />compliance with GHG related plans can support a determination that a project's cumulative effect <br />is not cumulatively considerable. The Project would be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan, <br />the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, the City of Santa Ana General Plan, and the City's Climate Action Plan. <br />As the Project is consistent with these GHG reduction plans, the Project would also be consistent <br />with the State's long-term goal to achieve carbon neutrality (zero -net emissions). Impacts related <br />to the generation of GHGs and consistency with an applicable GHG plan would be less than <br />significant. Therefore, the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts related to GHGs would not <br />be cumulatively considerable. Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br />pp. 4.5-34 — 4.5-35.) <br />4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br />Threshold H-1: The Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the <br />environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous <br />materials. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to hazards <br />and hazardous materials related to routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. <br />(Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.6-17 — 4.6-19.) <br />Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement the following regulatory requirement <br />(Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.6-9): <br />RR HAZ-1: Hazardous materials and hazardous wastes will be transported to and/or from <br />projects developed under the General Plan Update in compliance with any applicable state <br />and federal requirements, including the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations <br />listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Hazardous Materials Transportation <br />Act); California Department of Transportation standards; and the California Occupational <br />Safety and Health Administration standards. <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />4-15 <br />