Laserfiche WebLink
4 NO ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT <br />ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS WITHOUT MITIGATION MEASURES <br />necessary to ensure groundwater discharges would not contain high levels of pollutants. <br />Therefore, with compliance to the Construction General Permit and Groundwater Discharge <br />Permit, the Project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or <br />otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater during construction, and construction - <br />related impacts would be less than significant. <br />The Project's storm drain network would be designed to match existing drainage and flow patterns <br />to best utilize the capacities available in the existing public storm drain system. The Project would <br />follow the requirements of the local MS4 Permit, as required by RR HYD-4, and the Orange <br />County Technical Guidance Document and incorporate post -construction BMPs and low impact <br />development (LID) measures in its project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). The <br />Project's WQMP must be reviewed and approved by the City to ensure it complies with the local <br />MS4 Permit and Orange County DAMP regulations. Therefore, with incorporation of typical post - <br />construction BMPs and LID measures and adherence to applicable permits, the Project would not <br />violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially <br />degrade surface or groundwater during operation, and operational impacts would be less than <br />significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.7-11 — 4.7-14.) <br />Threshold HYD-2: The Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may <br />impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to hydrology <br />and water quality related to groundwater. Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement <br />regulatory requirements RR HYD-1; RR HYD-4; and RR HYD-5 (listed above). (Draft <br />Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.7-14 — 4.7-15.) <br />Explanation of the Rationale: Construction of the Project would require dewatering activities <br />due to the Project's excavation for the proposed subterranean parking. However, dewatering <br />activities would be temporary and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. <br />Additionally, the Project would add a projected 339 acre-feet per year (AFY) of water demand in <br />the current year, which is approximately 1 percent of overall City water demand. The City would <br />have sufficient supply to meet the current and projected demand of the Project during normal, <br />single -dry, and multiple -dry years. In single -dry and multiple -dry years, thus, the Project would <br />not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. Further, because the Project site is already <br />developed with paved surfaces, development of the Project would not interfere with groundwater <br />recharge. Therefore, the Project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or <br />interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft <br />Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.7-14 — 4.7-15.) <br />Threshold HYD-3(i): The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of <br />the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream <br />or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which <br />would: result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. <br />Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to hydrology <br />and water quality related to substantial erosion or siltation. Additionally, the City finds that the <br />Project will implement regulatory requirements RR HYD-1; RR HYD-4; and RR HYD-5 (listed <br />above). (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.7-16 — 4.7-17.) <br />City of Santa Ana The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />August 2025 CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />4-21 <br />