My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Responses to CEQA Related - Agenda Item No. 28
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
09/16/2025
>
Staff Responses to CEQA Related - Agenda Item No. 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2025 4:37:50 PM
Creation date
9/16/2025 4:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Village Santa Ana Specific Plan Project <br />Response to ObjectionLetter T1: Andrew Salas, Gabrieleño Band of Mission <br />Indians –Kizh Nation, dated September 5, 2025 <br />Response T1-1: Thecommentintroduces the letter on behalf of the Gabrieleño Band of Mission <br />Indians – Kizh Nation (herein, Kizh Nation) regarding their review of the project Final <br />Supplemental EIR. The Kizh Nation expresses opposition to the City’s decision to update Tribal <br />Cultural Resource (TCR) mitigation measures in the Final Supplemental EIR based on a public <br />comment letter submitted by the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes <br />(herein, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians)As this section is introducing the topics to be discussed <br />in the comment letter, the commenter is referred to the responses to each detailed comment <br />below. The commenter’s specific concerns are included in the subsequent Comment Nos. T1-2 <br />through T1-11. Refer to Response Nos. T1-2 through T1-11 for specific responses to such <br />concerns. No further response is required. <br />Response T1-2: The comment alleges that the City substituted the views of a non-consulting <br />entity (Juaneño Band of Mission Indians) in place of consultation with the Kizh Nation. <br />In compliance with CEQA, the City initiated the Senate Bill (SB) 18 and AB 52 tribal consultation <br />process on November 18, 2023, when the City transmitted written notification to a list of tribes to <br />provide the opportunity to consult regarding the proposed project. In accordance with Government <br />Code Section 65352.3, the contacted tribes included tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated <br />with the project area and tribes maintained on the Native American Heritage Commission’s <br />contact list, which included both the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians and the Kizh Nation, as <br />described in Section 4.14, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the Draft Supplemental EIR. Under SB <br />18, once the City’s notification is transmitted, tribes have 90 days to request consultation <br />(Government Code Section 65352.3(a)(2)). Under AB 52, tribes have 30 days from receipt of the <br />formal notification to request consultation (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1). On March <br />8, 2024, the Kizh Nation responded to the City’s notification with a request to consult, which <br />occurred via email. The result of the consultation process was the incorporation of the Kizh <br />Nation’s provided mitigation measures, as presented in the Draft Supplemental EIR. Though the <br />Juaneño Band of Mission Indians did not respond to the City’s invitation to consult under SB 18 <br />or AB 52, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians submitted a comment letter on June 10, 2025 on <br />the Draft Supplemental EIR requesting mitigation measures be incorporated to provide for <br />monitoring by the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians. This comment letter was submitted during <br />the public review period for the Draft Supplemental EIR in accordance with CEQA. The Native <br />American Heritage Commission’s list for the project area includes the Juaneño Band of Mission <br />Indians as a tribe traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area. Based on comments <br />received from the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, as part of the Final Supplemental EIR, the <br />City added Project-specific MM TCR-4 and MM TCR-5 to provide for monitoring by the Juaneño <br />Band of Mission Indians. Project-specific MM TCR-6 is also included regarding resource <br />identification, dispute resolution, and final disposition of any recovered resources. These <br />mitigation measures are in addition to the measures requested by the Kizh Nation and do not <br />change the substance of the measures requested by Kizh Nation or result in new or substantially <br />more severe impacts. <br />Response T1-3: The comment argues that public comments are not a substitute for consultation <br />and cannot override tribe-specific mitigation measures and also suggests that by incorporating <br />Juaneño Band of Mission Indians’ mitigation measures, the City ignored its duty to reflect Kizh <br />Nation consultation outcomes in the Final Supplemental EIR. <br />City of Santa Ana September 2025 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.