Laserfiche WebLink
specifically, the GHG plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the Project <br /> would comply with the regulations and GHG reduction goals, policies, actions, and strategies <br /> outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan, 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, and the City's GPU and Climate Action <br /> Plan. Consistency with these plans would reduce the impact of the Project's incremental <br /> contribution to GHG emissions. Accordingly, the Project would not conflict with any applicable <br /> plan, policy, regulation, or recommendation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. <br /> Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.5-23—4.5-34.) <br /> Cumulative Impacts: The Project would not result in cumulative impacts concerning greenhouse <br /> gas emissions. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant cumulative impacts <br /> concerning greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement <br /> regulatory requirements RR GHG-1 through RR GHG-3 and RR GHG-7 (listed above). (Draft <br /> Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.5-34—4.5-35.) <br /> Explanation of the Rationale: State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) states that <br /> compliance with GHG related plans can support a determination that a project's cumulative effect <br /> is not cumulatively considerable. The Project would be consistent with the 2022 Scoping Plan, <br /> the 2020-2045 RTPISCS,the City of Santa Ana General Plan, and the City's Climate Action Plan. <br /> As the Project is consistent with these GHG reduction plans, the Project would also be consistent <br /> with the State's long-term goal to achieve carbon neutrality (zero-net emissions). Impacts related <br /> to the generation of GHGs and consistency with an applicable GHG plan would be less than <br /> significant. Therefore, the Project's contribution to cumulative impacts related to GHGs would not <br /> be cumulatively considerable. Impacts would be less than significant. (Draft Supplemental EIR, <br /> pp. 4.5-34—4.5-35.) <br /> 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br /> Threshold H 1: The Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the <br /> environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous <br /> materials. <br /> Findings: The City finds that the Project would result in less than significant impacts to hazards <br /> and hazardous materials related to routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. <br /> (Draft Supplemental EIR, pp. 4.6-17—4.6-19.) <br /> Additionally, the City finds that the Project will implement the following regulatory requirement <br /> (Draft Supplemental EIR, p. 4.6-9): <br /> RR HAZ-1: Hazardous materials and hazardous wastes will be transported to and/or from <br /> projects developed under the General Plan Update in compliance with any applicable state <br /> and federal requirements, including the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations <br /> listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Hazardous Materials Transportation <br /> Act); California Department of Transportation standards; and the California Occupational <br /> Safety and Health Administration standards. <br /> Resolution No. 2025-041 <br /> Page 35 of 140 <br />