My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MACHINIST CAREER COLLEGE(MCC) (4TH WATCH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES)
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
M
>
MACHINIST CAREER COLLEGE(MCC) (4TH WATCH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 2:56:44 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:25:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
4TH WATCH EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (MACHINIST CAREER COLLEGE)(MCC)
Contract #
A-2023-069-35
Agency
Community Development
Council Approval Date
5/2/2023
Expiration Date
6/30/2027
Insurance Exp Date
2/27/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution —The delegation form is used to delegate ETPL responsibilities (including <br /> providers/programs) to another Local Board. Individual providers cannot be delegated to <br /> another Local Board. If a provider moves its headquarters from one Local Area to another,the <br /> responsibility for that provider changes, and both Local Board ETPL Coordinators should be <br /> made aware of the change. <br /> Eligibility <br /> General Eligibility <br /> Comment#27—Can Local Boards place the burden of proof on providers to prove that their <br /> programs meet the requirements for eligibility? <br /> Resolution —Local Board staff are required to review programs to ensure they meet eligibility <br /> requirements, including credentials. Once all necessary information is entered, the Local ETPL <br /> Coordinator must review and nominate the training provider and/or program for inclusion on <br /> the CA ETPL ensuring all information provided is complete, accurate, and current, and is in <br /> alignment with this Directive. <br /> Comment#28—What documentation is required to demonstrate a provider's partnership <br /> with local businesses? <br /> Resolution —This will vary depending on the Local Board and their local policy. The state will <br /> allow Local Boards to decide what is considered "in partnership with business. <br /> Comment#29—Will the negotiated goals be the same as WIOA title I programs or will there <br /> be different ones for training provider programs? <br /> Resolution —programs must meet the performance requirements described in the continued <br /> eligibility section of the Directive, as well as the state-level Title I Adult performance goal. <br /> Comment#30—Why are training providers that do not award degrees and solely provide <br /> educational programs for total charges of$2,500 not allowed? If a provider has a BPPE <br /> .exemption, it is unclear if a W1OA-funded ITA is considered Federal student financial aid and <br /> therefore ineligible. <br /> Resolution—This exemption prohibits anyfederal funding be used to pay forthis program, <br /> thus excluding WIOA funding from being used. Section 74110 of the CEC defines public funding <br /> as "any financial aid paid on behalf of students or directly to an institution from any public <br /> k <br /> source," which includes WIOA. <br /> Initial Eligibility <br /> Comment#31— Performance requirements for initial eligibility limit customer choice and local <br /> autonomy by removing the ability for new training providers to be added to the ETPL without <br /> performance data.The Draft Directive does not specify the source of the performance metrics. <br /> If in the past, it will come from a provider's BPPE Annual Report, this will further inhibit a Local <br /> Board's autonomy as BPPE is currently two years behind in publishing performance data and, <br /> in fact, does not even allow a provider to upload data until September for publication in <br /> Page 7 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.