Laserfiche WebLink
Comment#107-- Local Boards may have additional criteria in order to be listed locally. For <br /> those who do not meet our local requirements, we are expected to list and manage them for <br /> the CA ETPL even though we will not use them locally? For both initial and continued <br /> eligibility? What happens when a provider has an onsite program and have no enrollments? <br /> We are expected to monitor them for compliance, review their performance, and provide <br /> technical assistance even though they aren't utilized? <br /> Resolution --if a provider and/or program meets the state requirements for the ETPL, and <br /> their business is headquartered in Local Area A, then Local Board A must nominate this <br /> provider profile to the CA ETPL. If the provider also has programs located in Local Area A,then <br /> Local Board A must review and nominate those programs for inclusion on the ETPL—even if <br /> this means the provider would not receive any participants.The Local Area can choose to only <br /> use their local ETPL for serving their participants, but the providers on the CA ETPL still should <br /> be available for other Local Boards to use. Local Board A would monitor for compliance, review <br /> performance, and.provide technical assistance. The Local Board can delist the provider if the <br /> provider has not served at least one Title I, subtitle B enrollment during the previous two <br /> program years.See "Training Provider Continued Eligibility Criteria" for requirements to be <br /> reinstated to the ETPL. <br /> Comment#108-Will there be copy and paste functionality added or radio button to add a. <br /> program to the local ETPL? <br /> Resolution—CalJOBS includes the ability to copy program data and create duplicate programs <br /> as needed via the "Duplicate" button in the Education and Training Programs tab. See <br /> Attachment 5 for more guidance on how to navigate CaIJOBS. <br /> Comment#109-As written, it appears that providers outside the Local Area must be included <br /> on the local ETPL, if there is no specific local criteria. What Is the reasoning behind requiring all <br /> CA ETPL to be also on the local ETPL? We don't include out-of-area training on our local ETPL, <br /> but if a participant requests it,we will consider it on a case-by-case basis. Local Boards should <br /> have the autonomy to consider allowing interested participants to attend out-of-area <br /> providers on a case-by-case basis. <br /> Resolution—A local ETPL is available for Local Boards to require additional criteria (such as <br /> location) for providers to meet, in order for them to serve participants using WIOA funds. If no <br /> additional requirements are added, then the Local ETPL will mirror the CA ETPL. <br /> Comment#110—Providers and programs may be eligible forthe CA ETPL but not on the local <br /> ETPL. Are Local Boards required to nominate them, based only on the requirements of the <br /> Directive, will now be responsible to manage that provider and programs on the ETPL? <br /> Resolution —Yes. If the provider meets the CA ETPL requirements, Local Boards are <br /> responsible for nominating providers headquartered in their Local Area to the CA ETPL. They <br /> are also responsible for nominating programs located within their Local Area to the ETPL, <br /> assuming they meet the CA ETPL requirements. Per TELL 8-19, page S, Local Boards can only <br /> use CA ETPL requirements when reviewing providers for the CA ETPL.After conducting state <br /> Page 21 of 25 <br />