Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />JULY 2010 FIRST STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Mitigation Measures <br />WQ-1 During final design, the City of Santa Ana shall prepare specifications for an Erosion Control <br />Plan, to be included in the bid package that describes the best management practices (BMPs) <br />to be implemented during construction. The BMPs shall include Erosion and Sediment <br />Control BMPs from the California Stormwater Quality Association's Stormwater Best <br />Management Practice Handbook - Construction. The City of Santa Ana shall ensure that the <br />construction contractor implements and maintains the BMPs identified in the Erosion Control <br />Plan during project construction. <br />WQ-2 During final design, the City of Santa Ana shall prepare a Final Water Quality Management <br />Plan (WQMP) that details the Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control BMPs to <br />be incorporated into the proposed project. The BMPs shall be consistent with the Orange <br />County Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) and City of Santa Ana Local Implementation <br />Plan (LIP) and shall be properly designed, installed, and maintained to target pollutants of <br />concern. The Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control BMPs shall include, but <br />not be limited to, common area landscape management, BMP maintenance, storm drain <br />stenciling, slope protection and energy dissipation, minimization of impervious areas and <br />connectivity, a biofiltration swale, and catch basin inserts. <br />B. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater <br />recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local <br />groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level <br />which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? <br />Less than significant impact. The project does not require use of water from a groundwater well or <br />aquifer; therefore, groundwater supplies would not be affected by the proposed project. Historically, <br />groundwater has been encountered between 5 and 28 ft below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater is <br />not anticipated to be encountered during construction of the proposed project; therefore, groundwater <br />dewatering is not anticipated. The project proposes bridge replacement and street widening. These <br />uses currently exist on the site and do not require provision of potable water. Consequently, the <br />proposed project will also not require an additional provision of potable water. <br />The project would result in an addition of 0.30 ac of impervious area on site due to the street <br />widening and thus reducing the amount of area available for groundwater infiltration. The project site <br />is not considered an important area for groundwater recharge due to its high level of development. <br />Therefore, impacts to groundwater supply are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is <br />required. <br />C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or <br />sitation on or off-site? <br />Less than significant with mitigation. As discussed in detail in VII1.A., during construction the <br />project would be required to implement an Erosion Control Plan and implement Erosion and <br />07/25/10 ,P:\DMJ0701\MND\4.0 Environmental Analysis.doc» <br />4-22 <br />20A-73