|
Resolution No. 2025-28
<br />Page 4 of 9
<br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the
<br />City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph
<br />M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the
<br />Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other
<br />federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or
<br />any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall
<br />have the right to approve the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that
<br />Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily
<br />incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant
<br />of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the
<br />Action.
<br />Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
<br />and the CEQA Guidelines, and after completion of the Initial Study for the Project, the
<br />Project is within the scope of the 2010 Transit Zoning Code Environmental Impact Report
<br />(EIR) (SCH No. 2006071100). The EIR analyzed impacts related to aesthetics,
<br />agriculture/forestry, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils, greenhouse gas
<br />emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and
<br />planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public services,
<br />transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources and utilities. The EIR concluded that there
<br />would be significant and unavoidable impacts associated with aesthetics, air quality,
<br />cultural resources, noise, and transportation, and mitigation measures were developed
<br />and recorded through an approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The
<br />previously prepared EIR adequately described the project’s environmental setting,
<br />significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures related to each impact.
<br />There are no substantial changes with respect to circumstances under which the project
<br />is undertaken that will require major revisions to the EIR. There is no new information of
<br />substantial importance, and there are no new environmental impact or mitigation measure
<br />needed. As such, a Notice of Determination will be filed for this project.
<br />Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting
<br />the public hearing, hereby approves TTM No. 2025-03, as conditioned in Exhibit A,
<br />attached hereto and incorporated herein for the Project at 930 N. Grand Avenue, and as
<br />illustrated and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. This decision is
<br />based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not
<br />limited to: The Request for Planning Commission Action dated September 22, 2025, and
<br />exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are
<br />incorporated herein by this reference.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />[Signatures on the following page]
|