|
<br />Resolution No. 2025-XX
<br />Page 4 of 9
<br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voter s of
<br />the City) for or concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the
<br />Ralph M. Brown Act, California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning
<br />Law, the Subdivision Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or
<br />any other federal, state or local constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule,
<br />regulation, or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed
<br />that the City shall have the right to approve the legal counsel providing the Cit y’s
<br />defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses
<br />directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall
<br />promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with
<br />Applicant in the defense of the Action.
<br />Section 3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
<br />(CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, and after completion of the Initial Study for the
<br />Project, the Project is within the scope of the 2010 Transit Zon ing Code Environmental
<br />Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2006071100). The EIR analyzed impacts related to
<br />aesthetics, agriculture/forestry, air quality, biology, cultural resources, geology/soils,
<br />greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydro logy and water
<br />quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population/housing, public
<br />services, transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources and utilities. The EIR concluded
<br />that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts associa ted with aesthetics, air
<br />quality, cultural resources, noise, and transportation, and mitigation measures were
<br />developed and recorded through an approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
<br />Program. The previously prepared EIR adequately described the project’s
<br />environmental setting, significant impacts and alternatives, and mitigation measures
<br />related to each impact. There are no substantial changes with respect to c ircumstances
<br />under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the EIR. There
<br />is no new information of substantial importance, and there are no new environmental
<br />impact or mitigation measure needed. As such, a Notice of Determination will be filed
<br />for this project.
<br />Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting
<br />the public hearing, hereby approves TTM No. 2025-03, as conditioned in Exhibit A,
<br />attached hereto and incorporated herein for the Project at 930 N. Grand Avenue, and as
<br />illustrated and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. This decision is
<br />based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not
<br />limited to: The Request for Planning Commission Action dated September 22, 2025, and
<br />exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are
<br />incorporated herein by this reference.
<br />
<br />
<br />[Signatures on the following page]
<br />
<br />
<br />
|