|
Resolution No. 2025-37
<br />Page 7 of 15
<br />quality, greenhouse gas emissions, health risks, noise, and vibration were fully analyzed.
<br />These technical studies have been included as part of the staff report for the Planning
<br />Commission’s consideration. The results of these studies confirm that the Project will not
<br />create significant environmental impacts during either construction or operation.
<br />
<br />The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Assessment, including Health
<br />Risk Assessment (HRA), determined that the emissions from construction and long-term
<br />operations would remain below regional and state significance thresholds. The study also
<br />found that exposure to toxic air contaminants would be well below acceptable health risk
<br />levels, confirming that the Project will not adversely affect nearby sensitive receptors.
<br />Moreover, the Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment evaluated anticipated construction
<br />and operational noise. The study determined that the constructed-related noise from
<br />demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, and paving would not exceed
<br />the construction noise standard threshold, and all construction activities will be limited to
<br />the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. during the weekdays in compliance with SAMC
<br />Sections 18-308 through 18-321. Operational noise from fueling, vehicle circulation, and
<br />delivery activities is expected to have minimal impact on surrounding land uses. Based
<br />on these findings, staff concludes that the Project will not result in significant
<br />environmental impacts, will not cumulatively contribute to regional air or noise pollution,
<br />and is consistent with the intent of CEQA. Therefore, no further environmental review is
<br />required beyond the Class 3 categorical exemption determination.
<br />
<br />Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City
<br />and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized
<br />volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands,
<br />lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal,
<br />equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute
<br />resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such
<br />other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively “Actions”), brought
<br />against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments,
<br />agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set
<br />aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or
<br />any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and
<br />instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or
<br />concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act,
<br />California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map
<br />Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local
<br />constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of
<br />competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve
<br />the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City
<br />for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of
<br />the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall
<br />cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action.
<br />
<br />Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the
<br />public hearing, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2025-27, as conditioned in
|