My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-02-03
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/03/2026 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2026-02-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2026 8:51:31 AM
Creation date
1/28/2026 8:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
2/3/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.4 Failure to Assess Residential Compatibility Before Approval <br /> No residential compatibility analysis was performed as part of the project review, despite the <br /> clear and direct impacts on the immediately abutting R-1 property. The absence of such an <br /> assessment disregarded a critical requirement for evaluating whether the expanded use could <br /> coexist with — or would materially harm -- the residential living environment. <br /> Without a compatibility study, decision-makers lacked the necessary findings to determine <br /> whether the project was suitable for approval at this location. This omission also prevented <br /> the imposition of conditions that would be typically required to protect nearby homes. <br /> The project, as approved, failed to uphold the protections afforded to R-1 residential <br /> properties under the Santa Ana Municipal Code and disregarded adopted General Plan policies <br /> requiring compatibility between institutional and single-family residential land uses. The <br /> intensification of institutional activity at the residential boundary, without appropriate <br /> analysis, buffering, or mitigation, resulted in an approval fundamentally inconsistent with R- <br /> 1 zoning intent and residential protection standards. This incompatibility constitutes an <br /> independent and sufficient basis to vacate and remand the approval for proper evaluation <br /> consistent with R-1 residential protections. <br /> 16 <br /> City Council 18 — 32 2/3/2026 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.