Laserfiche WebLink
I. The project was approved with procedural deficiencies related to the <br /> public notice, access for public review of the project, complex <br /> materials that burdened the public, misrepresentation of the <br /> proximity to the project site, omission of corridor context, lack of <br /> existing classroom enrollment data, inadequate consideration of land <br /> use changes, omission of dual use impact on adjacent residential <br /> property, failure to include enrollment growth enforcement <br /> measures, failure to disclose commercial even use within the <br /> corridor, limited public participation during the public hearing, <br /> imbalanced hearing structure and opposition time, and reasonable <br /> perception of predetermined outcome; <br /> II. The project was approved by using the incorrect CEQA exemption <br /> and improper environmental review of the project; <br /> III. The multi-institutional corridor conditions and impacts on the single <br /> family residence; <br /> IV. The decision to process the proposed project as a modification to the <br /> existing CUP No. 1982-18, rather than a new CUP lead to improper <br /> review of the project; <br /> V. The project did not consider residential protection and land use <br /> compatibility violations; <br /> VI. The project violates senior residents, Americans with Disabilities Act, <br /> and Fair Housing Act by imposing impacts that hinder protected <br /> individuals to fully and equally enjoy their homes; <br /> VII. The conditions of approval for the project lack mitigation measures <br /> to diminish potential impacts; <br /> Vill. The City failed to evaluate cumulative impacts arising from the <br /> addition of the school to the existing institutional uses; <br /> IX. The City failed to considered less intrusive or lower impact <br /> alternatives; and <br /> X. The approval did not advance the public interest nor uphold equitable <br /> treatment of affected residents. <br /> D. Pursuant to Section 41-645 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the City <br /> Council may, after public hearing, affirm, reverse, change, modify the <br /> original decision and may make any additional determination it shall <br /> consider appropriate within the limitations imposed by Chapter 41. <br /> E. On February 3, 2026, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public <br /> hearing on Appeal Application No. 2025-02; <br /> Resolution No. 2026-xx <br /> City Council 18 — 48 6 <br />