My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet_2026-02-03
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/03/2026 Regular
>
Agenda Packet_2026-02-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2026 8:51:31 AM
Creation date
1/28/2026 8:46:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Date
2/3/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Application No. 2025-02 — Forty Martyrs Armenian Church Middle School (5311 <br /> W. McFadden Avenue) <br /> 2. Appellant Request: CEQA Misapplication and Class 14 Inapplicability. <br /> Analysis of Issue: <br /> As of January 6, 2026, the California Department of Education (CDE) lists the <br /> status of the Ari Guiragos Minassian Armenian School as active. Additionally, the <br /> status of the school on the CDE directory is not relevant to the CEQA determination <br /> for the project. <br /> Section 15314 (Class 14) of the CEQA Guidelines consists of minor additions to <br /> existing schools within existing school grounds where the addition does not <br /> increase original student capacity by more than 25 percent or ten classrooms, <br /> whichever is less. As stated in the staff report, the proposed addition will increase <br /> the student capacity eight percent, which is significantly less than 25 percent, and <br /> it only proposes to add four classrooms and one laboratory. <br /> When a CEQA exemption is identified and can be applied to a proposed project, <br /> additional environmental review is not necessary. The proposed project qualified <br /> for a Class 14 exemption, pursuant to the CEQA guidelines, which exempted the <br /> project from further environmental review. Moreover, pursuant to Section 15300.2 <br /> (a) through (f) of the CEQA guidelines, exceptions to the CEQA exemptions do not <br /> apply to the proposed project because the project is not located on an <br /> environmentally sensitive location nor on a hazardous waste site, does not have <br /> significant cumulative impact nor significant effect according to the focused traffic <br /> study and parking demand analysis documents that are part of the Planning <br /> Commission staff report (Exhibit 3 to the February 3, 2026 City Council staff <br /> report), and it will not cause substantial adverse change of a historical resource. <br /> Nevertheless, the applicant prepared focused traffic studies and parking <br /> management plans to identify any potential negative impacts of the proposed <br /> project. The technical studies did not identify negative impacts that would hinder <br /> the project from operating. On the contrary, the studies identified mitigation <br /> measures to prevent potential traffic and parking impacts to the neighboring <br /> properties. <br /> As stated on pages five and six of the Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit 3 <br /> to the February 3, 2026 City Council staff report), the school would continue to <br /> Exhibit 6 — Response to Appeal Comments <br /> ity ouncil 18 — 160 2/3/2026 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.