My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 18 - Appeal Application of Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of a Private School
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
02/03/2026
>
Item 18 - Appeal Application of Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Expansion of a Private School
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2026 10:11:01 AM
Creation date
1/28/2026 10:09:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
18
Date
2/3/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Appeal Application No. 2025-02 – Forty Martyrs Armenian Church Middle School (5311 <br />W. McFadden Avenue) <br />February 3, 2026 <br />Page 4 <br />5 <br />4 <br />9 <br />2 <br />At the time of construction, the private school facility was designed to accommodate <br />elementary students, serving pre-kindergarten through sixth grade. While CUP No. 1982- <br />18 allowed the private school use extending through ninth grade, the 17,500-square-foot <br />building did not provide the necessary floor area or capacity to serve students above the <br />sixth grade. Furthermore, the school’s operational program and curriculum were limited <br />to elementary education, and no middle school grades were implemented under the <br />existing CUP. Since its original construction, the City has not received a significant <br />amount of complaints regarding noise, circulation, parking, lighting, or other quality-of-life <br />impacts from residents or owners of the surrounding properties. <br />Analysis of Appeal <br />Pursuant to Section 41-645 of the SAMC, an appeal from a decision of the Planning <br />Commission can be made by an interested party, individual, or group. An appeal <br />application was received appealing the Planning Commission’s decision to approve CUP <br />No. 1982-18-MOD-1. <br />The appellant is requesting the following actions: <br /> <br />1. Vacate the Planning Commission’s approval of CUP No. 1982-18-MOD-1; <br />2. Remand consideration of CUP No. 1982-18-MOD-1 back to the Planning <br />Commission; <br />3. Conduct at minimum an Initial Study as part of the CEQA analysis that accompanies <br />re-consideration of CUP No. 1982-18-MOD-1 by the Planning Commission; and <br />4. Demonstrate that the project is compatible with neighborhood context, and if it <br />cannot demonstrate compatibility, deny the project. <br />The Planning Commission agenda packet prepared for the Project contained all <br />necessary information for the Planning Commission to evaluate the applicant’s request <br />and is provided as Exhibit 3 to this report. A copy of the submitted appeal application is <br />provided as Exhibit 1, and a detailed analysis of and response to the eight claims made <br />in Appeal Application No. 2025-02 is provided as Exhibit 6. <br />Planning Commission Determination Supporting Approval <br />CUP requests are governed by Section 41-638 of the SAMC, and modifications to existing <br />CUPs require a new application under Section 41-649. A CUP may be granted if it can <br />be demonstrated that the proposed project will not adversely impact the community or <br />conflict with the General Plan. The requisite findings of fact are detailed in the Planning <br />Commission Staff Report – October 27, 2025 (Exhibit 3) attached to this report, and <br />additional analysis supporting these findings is provided in the sections below.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.