RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. (13) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Santa Ana rI a 2001 East First Street Project CEQA Peer Review adequately addressed,which leads to additional review and comments,Rincon will contact the City to discuss how to proceed. Under Task 1, if needed, Rincon will coordinate with the City and the Applicant/Consultant team at up to two virtual meetings to discuss the comments,suggested changes,add itions,etc.to the documents. Deliverables • Comments Matrix outlining peer review comments provided on the Class 32 CE and technical documents • Each round of comments will be presented in its own column(i.e., Round 1 and Round 2)with columns for Applicant/Consultant team responses. Assumptions • The peer review will consist of two rounds of peer review and comments(this assumes that the Applicant/Consultant team will adequately respond to all comments in the first round,the second round of peer review is only to backcheck revisions made in response to Round 1 comments) • All draft documentation will be provided together to avoid unnecessary stopping and starting as well as with the understandingthat one technical analysis can influence another and may need to be reviewed in tandem. If provided separately, additional time and cost for the peer review may be needed. • The Class 32 CE will be provided asthefollowing: 1)individual sections in Word format,and/or 2) compiled PDF with Figures. • Technical documents can be provided in PDF format. • Second submittal of Class 32 CE and technical documents from the Applicant/Consultant team will be provided showing all revisions in track changes. Furthermore,they will provide detailed responses in the Comments Matrix explaining how and where they responded to each of our peer review comments. • The Applicant/Consultant team will be responsible for making any revisions to the Class 32 CE and technical documents based on Rincon's comments. Additional technical analysis, if needed, is not included in this scope of work. if needed,we will immediately contact the City to discuss the next course of action. • While we believe our scope and cost estimate are reasonable,the adequacy of the Class 32 CE and technical documents,as well as the potential complexityof issues,cannot be predicted with certainty.Therefore, if the efforts to complete the peer review would require additional hours, we reserve the right to renegotiate the budget in coordination with the City. • The peer reviews are limited to the analyses discussed under Task 2; if any other project- related studies need to be peer reviewed, additional time and cost for the peer review(s)may be needed. • It is assumed that the Air Quality study does not include a refined health risk assessment; Rincon will review the applicability of the assessment methodology and thresholds used, and the results and conclusions. 4