Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the substantial evidence set forth in the record, including but-not <br /> limited to the 1983 EIR, the 1996 Addendum, and the 2019 Addendum, the <br /> Planning Commission finds that an addendum is the appropriate document for <br /> disclosing the changes to the MainPlace Mall Property, and that none of the <br /> conditions identified in Public Resources Code section 21166 and State CEQA <br /> Guidelines section 15162 requiring subsequent environmental review have <br /> occurred, because: <br /> A. The MainPlace Project does not constitute a substantial change that would <br /> require major revisions of the 1983 EIR due to the involvement of new <br /> significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of <br /> previously identified significant effects. <br /> B. There is not a substantial change with respect to the circumstances under <br /> which the MainPlace Project will be developed that would require major <br /> revisions of the 1983 EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br /> environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of the <br /> previously identified significant effects. <br /> C. New information of substantial importance has not been presented that was <br /> not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable <br /> diligence at the time the 1983 EIR was certified or adopted, showing any of <br /> the following: (1) that the modifications would have one or more significant <br /> effects not discussed in the earlier environmental documentation; (Ii) that <br /> significant effects previously examined would be substantially more severe <br /> than shown in the earlier environmental documentation; (Ili) that mitigation <br /> measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be <br /> feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but <br /> the applicant declined to adopt such measures; or (iv) that mitigation <br /> measures or alternatives considerably different from those analyzed <br /> previously would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br /> environment, but which the applicant declined to adopt. <br /> SECTION 2. FINDINGS, Based on the entire record before the City Council, <br /> including all written and oral evidence presented to the City Council, the City Council <br /> hereby determines that following findings, which must be established in order to grant <br /> Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01, have been established as required by Santa Ana <br /> Municipal Code: <br /> A. The proposed project, as conditioned, and its design and improvements are <br /> consistent with the District Center designation of the General Plan and are <br /> otherwise consistent with all other Elements of the General Plan, <br /> Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01, as conditioned, and its design and <br /> improvements will be consistent with the District Center (DC) land use <br /> designation of the General Plan and are otherwise consistent with all other <br /> Elements of the General Plan and applicable Specific Plans. The proposed <br /> subdivision is consistent with: <br /> Resolution No. 2019-041 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br />