My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/07/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2026 4:55:41 PM
Creation date
3/24/2026 3:55:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 79. Ms.Ferrer's handouts stated that both the internal and practical examinations would be held <br /> 2 <br /> on the same date for each candidate(as was the usual practice)and that a 5-day grievance period would be <br /> 3 <br /> 4 allowed for each interview. Ms. Ferrer also stated that the panel members had yet to be chosen. However, <br /> 5 it was understood by department members that, as the panel members would be chosen by Chief Valentin, <br /> 6 they would be highly favorable to his preferred candidates (i.e., those in"the Valentin camp.") <br /> 7 <br /> 80. However,Ms. Ferrer informed the candidates that there would be a change in the multiple- <br /> 8 <br /> 9 choice written test which was a departure from past practice. The test would now entirely consist of"in- <br /> 10 house" questions written by"subject matter experts" from within the department. No longer would any <br /> I I questions from outside vendors such as Donnoe be utilized.As to whom these"subject matter experts"were, <br /> 12 <br /> how they were selected, or how they obtained their "expertise" was kept a complete mystery and not <br /> 13 <br /> 14 disclosed. Who was formulating these questions, who vetted them for accuracy or correctness, and, most <br /> 15 importantly,who had access to them remained a secret. Of course, this just added to speculation about the <br /> 16 increasing corruption of the testing process among department members. <br /> 17 <br /> 81. This change in the written test corresponded to a similar recent change in the Corporal written <br /> 18 <br /> 19 test.The Corporal written test had been altered earlier in 2022 to exclude the difficult Donnoe questions and <br /> 20 instead consisted entirely of simpler, easier internally-generated questions. <br /> 21 82. It became common discussion that the Corporal test was deliberately"dumbed down" to <br /> 22 <br /> benefit favorable"Valentin camp" candidates. In particular, the test was engineered to be simpler in order <br /> 23 <br /> 24 to directly benefit members of Chief Valentin's favored MET members,thereby enabling them to pass the <br /> 25 test and be promoted. As the MET team members were not known to be particularly astute or highly <br /> 26 educated,the Corporal test was specifically re-engineered to their lower capabilities. This was particularly <br /> 27 <br /> relevant with this Sergeant testing process as it now included several MET team candidates including Travis <br /> 28 <br /> Johnson and Luis Galleana. It appeared a similar dynamic was now being utilized on the Sergeant's test. <br /> ao <br /> KACAIRISKY v. CFFY OF SANTA ANA CASE No. <br /> COMPLAINT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.