My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 23 - Councilmember Requested Item Regarding Affordable Housing Funds and Policies
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/07/2026 Regular
>
Item 23 - Councilmember Requested Item Regarding Affordable Housing Funds and Policies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2026 12:23:37 PM
Creation date
4/1/2026 11:42:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Item #
23
Date
4/7/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures Page 10 <br />Proposal Review <br />After each deadline for the Open RFP Process, the Housing Division staff shall review the <br />Proposal to determine that the minimum Program and RFP Process requirements are met <br />(minimum threshold review). Proposals that do not meet the minimum threshold review will be <br />considered non-responsive. If the Proposal meets the minimum threshold review, the Housing <br />Division will form a Review Panel. The Review Panel for the RFP Process will consist of at <br />Community Development Agency and one outside agency or government-entity. If an employee <br />is not available in one department, a second employee may be requested from one of the other <br />two departments so long as there are at least two of the three City Agencies represented on the <br />Review Panel. <br />Using the scoring and selection criteria provided in the RFP Process and provided below, the <br />Review Panel shall determine whether the proposal is recommended for a pre-loan commitment, <br />with or without conditions. Including the scoring and selection criteria, the Review Panel shall <br />review the design of the proposed project for appropriateness for the proposed target group, <br />compatibility with surrounding uses, cost effectiveness of construction, and appropriateness of <br />the design and construction for low maintenance and long term durability. Proposed projects <br />must receive a minimum threshold score of 75 points to move forward with the proposal review <br />process. If the Review Panel determines, in its discretion, that the Proposal may be <br />recommended for approval, the Housing Division shall request an underwriting and subsidy <br />layering review by a real estate advisor selected by the City. The real estate advisor shall <br />confirm the underwriting for the Project, the financial gap, and other programmatic requirements <br />related to the funding sources. If the Review Panel determines that the Proposal will not be <br />recommended for approval (i.e. the Proposal does not meet the minimum threshold score of 75 <br />points), the Developer will be notified in writing of the decision and the result will be published <br />in the Housing Division Quarterly Report. <br />City Council Initiated Proposal Review <br />A Developer may submit a request for a sole source award of funding directly to the City <br />Council (the request cannot exceed the amount of the total Available Funds as published <br />on a quarterly basis in the Housing Division Quarterly Report). At least one Councilmember <br />must then submit a written request to staff to review . After a written <br />request has been received, staff will request a complete proposal from the Developer. After the <br />proposal has met a minimum threshold review by staff, the project will undergo an underwriting <br />and subsidy layering review analysis by a real estate advisor selected by the City, to be paid for <br />by the Developer. After the analysis has been completed, staff will present the real estate <br />analysis and the proposal to City Council for direction without any recommendation(s) <br />from staff on funding or not funding the project. If City Council requests a second real estate <br />analysis to be conducted, the City will pay for the second analysis, not the developer. <br />City Council Initiated Proposal Review <br />A Developer may submit a request for a sole source award of funding directly to the City <br />Council (the request cannot exceed the amount of the total Available Funds as published <br />on a quarterly basis in the Housing Division Quarterly Report). At least one Councilmember <br />must then submit a written request to staff to review . After a written <br />request has been received,staff will request a complete proposal from the Developer. After the <br />proposal has met a minimum threshold review by staff, the project will undergo an underwriting <br />and subsidy layering review analysis by a real estate advisor selected by the City, to be paid for <br />by the Developer. After the analysis has been completed, staff will present the real estate <br />analysis and the proposal to City Council for direction without any recommendation(s) <br />from staff on funding or not funding the project.If City Council requests a second real estate <br />analysis to be conducted, the City will pay for the second analysis, not the developer.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.