My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - CS Item No. 3
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/07/2026 Regular
>
Correspondence - CS Item No. 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2026 8:31:56 AM
Creation date
4/2/2026 8:28:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I DEFENDANTS. Said harm and injury includes,but is not limited to, special(economic)damages,general <br /> 2 <br /> (non-economic)damages,attorneys'fees[per Government Code§12965(b)],litigation costs,future damages <br /> 3 <br /> 4 and past damages, lost economic earning capacity in future employment endeavors and such further relief <br /> 5 as shown at the time of Trial and in excess of the minimal jurisdictional of this Court. <br /> 6 197. In addition to the damages sought above, as a proximate result of DEFENDANTS' actions <br /> 7 <br /> as alleged above, MENENDEZ will also seek all damages allowed by the Code. Government Code, <br /> 8 <br /> 9 §12965(c). <br /> 10 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION <br /> 11 FAILURE TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION <br /> 12 <br /> IN VIOLATION OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ACT <br /> 13 <br /> 14 (PLAINTIFF Against All DEFENDANTS) <br /> 15 198. MENENDEZ realleges Paragraphs 1 through 197 above and incorporates same as though <br /> 16 fully set forth herein. <br /> 17 <br /> 199. DEFENDANTS are suffering/have suffered with a number of lawsuits and complaints <br /> 18 <br /> 19 (including but not limited to the complaints from MENENDEZ) alleging discrimination, retaliation and <br /> 20 harassment and putting DEFENDANTS on notice and providing knowledge of the need to eliminate <br /> 21 discrimination, retaliation and harassment. <br /> 22 <br /> 200. Under the law, as well as their own policies, DEFENDANTS had an obligation to take <br /> 23 <br /> 24 corrective action to prevent further discrimination, retaliation and harassment of MENENDEZ but failed <br /> 25 to do so in violation of Section 12940, et. seq. of the California Government Code. DEFENDANTS failed <br /> 26 to conduct proper investigations, failed to turn over the results of these investigations, failed to implement <br /> 27 <br /> proper policies to prevent discrimination,retaliation and harassment and failed to properly punish those who <br /> 28 <br /> engaged in misconduct to deter further such future actions. <br /> 31 <br /> MENENDEZ V. CITY OF SANTA ANA CASENO. <br /> COMPLAINT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.