Laserfiche WebLink
1 49. MORENO-who opposed this unlawful treatment-asked for Sergeant Armstrong's opinion <br /> 2 <br /> since he had been present during Sergeant Ponce de Leon's statements. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 50. Sergeant Armstrong responding by confinning that he had not he any disinformation. <br /> 5 51. After the debrief concluded, MORENO confronted Sergeant Lizardi about spreading <br /> 6 unsubstantiated falsehoods about Sergeant Ponce de Leon and asked him to disclose who had told him. <br /> 7 <br /> Sergeant Lizardi refused. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 G. CITY Proceeds to Retaliate Against MORENO. <br /> 10 52. Within days (and with no investigation in violation of California law and CITY' s own <br /> I I policies and procedures),Valentin ordered Deputy Chief Paulson to write a negative log entry(i.e., "write <br /> 12 <br /> up")regarding IVIED O's conversation with Sergeant Lizardi. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 53. Shortly thereafter,Comman der Phil Craftapologized to MORENO forwriting a negative log <br /> 15 entry about MORENO regarding his conversation with Sergeant Lizardi. <br /> 16 54. MORE NO was confused because he had already received the negative log entry from Deputy <br /> 17 <br /> Chief Paulson. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 55. Commander Craft stated that he had also been ordered to write,a separate negative log entry <br /> 20 about the same incident. <br /> 21 56. MORENO emailed Rodriguez and asked that he produce this secret confidential <br /> 22 <br /> 23 memorandum that CITY had unlawfully intended - in violation of MORENO's Public Safety Officers <br /> 24 Procedural Bill of Rights Act rights - to conceal from MO ENO. <br /> 25 57. Withinminutes,Rodriguez walked into the Watch Commander's Office and gave MORENO <br /> 26 a copy of the memo. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 58, MORE NO reviewed the memo and confirmed it contained negative comments about him. <br /> to <br /> MOREM V. CITY OF SANTA ANA CASENa <br /> ICOMA94T <br />