My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19D - RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
08/16/2010
>
19D - RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
8/13/2010 5:14:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19D
Date
8/16/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Honorable Judge Kim Dunning <br />August 16, 2010 <br />Page 2 <br />was informed by the Orange County Counsel that the Orange County Grand Jury does not have <br />any such formal or published rules or standards. <br />The standard for abstention is best articulated in the Model Guide. In reference to abstention by <br />grand jury members for conflict of interest, it states on page 8: <br />"Because of the grand jury's extraordinary fact-finding powers and the sensitivity <br />of many of its activities, grand jurors must be careful to avoid involvement in <br />areas where an actual or perceived conflict of interest might exist. Avoiding <br />conflicts and the appearance of conflicts is important for several reasons. It <br />protects the integrity of the investigation; it protects the investigation of the grand <br />jury as an institution; and it protects individual grand jurors from civil or criminal <br />penalties." <br />Additionally, the County of Mendocino 2009 Grand Jury Procedures Manual requires all grand <br />jurors to sign a Code of Ethical Conduct. Among the obligations assumed thereunder, each <br />grand juror agrees: <br />"I will disclose to the Foreperson and/or the entire Grand Jury, any potential <br />conflicts of interest I may have or that may exist, either at the beginning of the <br />term, or that may develop during the term of my service on the Grand Jury. When <br />I have a conflict of interest, either real or perceived, I will abstain from <br />investigations, discussions, voting and report writing on such matters. I will abide <br />by any decision of the executive committee in matters concerning whether or not <br />a conflict of interest exists." <br />One of common grounds for abstention by grand jurors is bias. The Model Guide refers to <br />conflict of interest for bias at pages 8 & 9: <br />"In addition to avoiding conflicts of interest, a grand juror must not have an <br />identifiable bias regarding any actions that the grand jury may take. Bias is the <br />prejudgment of essential facts that prevents a member of the grand jury from <br />considering an issue objectively, including publicly expressing support or <br />opposition on a specific matter. Having an educated opinion on an issue should <br />not be considered as having a bias. The same disclosure and recusal that applies to <br />a potential conflict of interest should apply to preexisting bias." <br />The Humboldt County guide also clearly sets standards for abstention and the nexus between <br />bias and abstention on Page 44 as follows: <br />"Members of the grand jury must avoid any appearance of personal bias or <br />possible conflict of interest. Impartiality is an essential part of constructive <br />investigation. Each grand juror should advise the foreperson of any potential <br />conflict of interest or bias. When a grand juror has cause to believe that a matter <br />19D-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.