My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Councilmember Requested Item Related to a Speed Safety System Pilot Program
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
04/21/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Item 27 - Councilmember Requested Item Related to a Speed Safety System Pilot Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2026 10:28:42 AM
Creation date
4/15/2026 9:32:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Council
Item #
27
Date
4/21/2026
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bill Text - SB-1297 The City of Malibu's speed safety system pilot... https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bilINavClient.xhtmI?bill_id... <br />measures within three years of the end of the fiscal year in which the excess revenue was received. If traffic - <br />calming measures are not planned or constructed after the third year, excess revenue shall revert to the Active <br />Transportation Program established pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of the Streets and <br />Highways Code, to be allocated by the California Transportation Commission pursuant to Section 2381 of the <br />Streets and Highways Code. <br />(h) A person shall not be assessed a civil penalty if they are subject to criminal penalties for the same act. <br />(i) A speed safety system may only be in operation for five years, or until January 1, 2032, whichever date is <br />sooner. <br />22437. (a) No later than 30 calendar days from the date of mailing of a notice of violation, the recipient may <br />request an initial review of the notice by the issuing agency. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, <br />electronically, or in person. There shall be no charge for this review. If, following the initial review, the issuing <br />agency is satisfied that the violation did not occur, or that extenuating circumstances make cancellation of the <br />notice of violation appropriate in the interest of justice, the issuing agency shall cancel the notice of violation. The <br />issuing agency shall advise the processing agency, if any, of the cancellation. The issuing agency or the <br />processing agency shall mail the results of the initial review to the person contesting the notice within 60 days of <br />receipt of the recipient's request for an initial review, and, if cancellation of the notice does not occur following <br />that review, include a reason for that denial, notification of the ability to request an administrative hearing, and <br />notice of the procedures adopted by the designated jurisdiction for the administrative hearing, including for <br />waiving prepayment of the civil penalty based upon an inability to pay pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision <br />(b). <br />(b) (1) If the person contesting the notice of violation is dissatisfied with the results of the initial review, the <br />person may, no later than 21 calendar days following the mailing of the results of the issuing agency's initial <br />review, request an administrative hearing of the violation. The request may be made by telephone, in writing, <br />electronically, or in person. <br />(2) The person requesting an administrative hearing shall pay the amount of the civil penalty to the processing <br />agency. The issuing agency shall adopt a written procedure to allow a person to request an administrative <br />hearing without payment of the civil penalty upon satisfactory proof of an inability to pay the amount due. <br />(3) The administrative hearing shall be held within 90 calendar days following the receipt of a request for an <br />administrative hearing. The person requesting the hearing may request one continuance, not to exceed 21 <br />calendar days. <br />(c) The administrative hearing process shall include all of the following: <br />(1) The person requesting a hearing shall have the choice of a hearing upon written declaration, video <br />conference, or in person. An in -person hearing shall be conducted within the jurisdiction of the issuing agency. <br />(2) If the person requesting a hearing is an unemancipated minor, that person shall be permitted to appear at a <br />hearing or admit responsibility for the automated speed violation without the appointment of a guardian. The <br />processing agency may proceed against the minor in the same manner as against an adult. <br />(3) The administrative hearing shall be conducted in accordance with written procedures established by the <br />issuing agency and approved by the governing body or chief executive officer of the issuing agency. The hearing <br />shall provide an independent, objective, fair, and impartial review of contested automated speed violations. <br />(4) (A) The issuing agency's governing body or chief executive officer of the designated jurisdiction shall <br />appoint or contract with qualified independent examiners or administrative hearing providers that employ <br />qualified independent examiners to conduct the administrative hearings. Examiners shall demonstrate the <br />qualifications, training, and objectivity necessary to conduct a fair and impartial review, and shall meet the <br />minimum requirements specified in subparagraph (B). The examiner shall be separate and independent from <br />the notice of violation issuing and processing functions. An examiner's continued employment, performance <br />evaluation, compensation, and benefits shall not, directly or indirectly, be linked to the amount of civil penalties <br />upheld by the examiner or the number or percentage of violations upheld by the examiner. <br />(B) (i) Examiners shall have a minimum of 20 hours of training. The examiner, unless an employee of the <br />designated jurisdiction, is responsible for the costs of the training. The issuing agency may reimburse the <br />examiner for those costs. Training may be provided through any of the following: <br />(I) An accredited college or university. <br />7 of 10 4/12/2026, 3:11 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.