Laserfiche WebLink
Bill Text - AB-645 Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program. https://Ieginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtmI?bill_i... <br />lief LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION <br />Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites <br />AB-645 Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program. (2023-2024) <br />SHARE THIS: In /v Date Published: 10/16/2023 02:00 PM <br />Assembly Bill No. 645 <br />CHAPTER 808 <br />An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 70615 of the Government Code, and to add and repeal Article <br />3 (commencing with Section 22425) of Chapter 7 of Division 11 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. <br />Approved by Governor October 13, 2023. Filed with Secretary of State <br />October 13, 2023. I <br />LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST <br />AB 645, Friedman. Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program. <br />Existing law establishes a basic speed law that prohibits a person from driving a vehicle upon a highway at a <br />speed greater than is reasonable or prudent given the weather, visibility, traffic, and highway conditions and in no <br />event at a speed that endangers the safety of persons or property. <br />This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2032, the Cities of Los Angeles, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale, and Long <br />Beach, and the City and County of San Francisco to establish a Speed Safety System Pilot Program if the system <br />meets specified requirements. The bill would require a participating city or city and county to adopt a Speed <br />Safety System Use Policy and a Speed Safety System Impact Report before implementing the program, and <br />would require the participating city or city and county to engage in a public information campaign at least 30 days <br />before implementation of the program, including information relating to when the systems would begin detecting <br />violations and where the systems would be utilized. The bill would require a participating city or city and county to <br />issue warning notices rather than notices of violations for violations detected within the first 60 calendar days of <br />the program. The bill would also require a participating city or city and county to develop uniform guidelines for, <br />among other things, the processing and storage of confidential information. The bill would designate all <br />photographic or administrative records, not including data about the number of violations issued or the speeds at <br />which they were issued for, made by a system as confidential, and would only authorize public agencies to use <br />and allow access to these records for specified purposes. <br />This bill would specify that any violation of a speed law recorded by a speed safety system authorized by these <br />provisions would be subject only to the provided civil penalties. The bill would, among other things, provide for <br />the issuance of a notice of violation, an initial review, an administrative hearing, and an appeals process, as <br />specified, for a violation under this program. The bill would require any program created pursuant to these <br />provisions to offer a diversion program for indigent speed safety system violation recipients, as specified. The bill <br />would require a city or city and county participating in the pilot program to submit a report to evaluate the speed <br />safety system to determine the system's impact on street safety and economic impact on the communities where <br />the system is utilized. <br />Existing law establishes a $25 filing fee for specified appeals and petitions. <br />1 of 11 4/12/2026, 3:10 PM <br />