Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />May 4, 2026 <br /> <br />The Honorable Valerie Amezcua <br />Mayor, City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> <br />RE: Self-checkout Ordinance <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Amezcua, <br />On behalf of the Santa Ana grocery industry, I write to fully oppose Council moving forward with a Self- <br />Checkout Ordinance (SCO) with Santa Ana grocers receiving no notice, outreach, interaction, or genuine <br />opportunity to be heard, either publicly or privately, by the City Manager or Mayor as identified in the staff <br />report, nor from any Councilmembers. Passing an ordinance with significant impact on current and future <br />grocers with no interest or effort to understand policy impacts could appear disingenuousand is not aligned <br />with open policy making processes. <br />Grocers are avital and unique asset to Santa Ana. We nourish our consumers, provide jobs with growth <br />opportunities, are a centerpiece for retail areas, and are a significant ingredient in community and culture <br />building. We cherish our role in communities and hope you have the same appreciation. <br />Every other jurisdiction that has considered SCO regulation has held a public hearing for discussion followed <br />by adequate time to discuss the policy impacts openly and publicly before bringing forward an ordinance for <br />passage. Unfortunately, we would be forced to consider passage of this ordinance at this time a dismissal of <br />the importance of grocery and a denial of policy consideration in a fair and open manner. <br />I am sure you would agree it is vital for policymakers to ensure all voices are recognized and heard, even if <br />disagreements arise. Consumers,grocery employees, and grocers all deserve the process and time necessary <br />for Council to make a fully informed decision.A complete lack of engagement with grocers targeted for <br />regulation is counter to what we believe we should all strive for, which is deliberative and process-based <br />public policy decisions. <br />Based on the existing circumstances, we request the Council remove the agenda item from this meeting and <br />withhold any ordinance consideration until after Santa Ana grocers have had a chance to genuinely engage in <br />an open and respectful policy process. <br />We also offer our commitment to discuss and review SCO operations, employeeand consumer impacts, and <br />real-world results from other jurisdictions. We are also open to engaging in a partnership to discuss potential <br />policy options which do not overly burden grocery operations. However, to make these commitments we <br />would need to be assured of an open and respectful consideration process. <br />It should also be recognized that UFCW, who represents grocery workers, negotiated and ratified a new <br />Collective Bargaining Agreement covering all of Southern California in mid 2025 and lasting through 2028. <br />This agreement already speaks to SCO staffing, utilization and operations. The parameters of this employee- <br />employer decision do not rise in any way to the depth and severity of regulation currently being sought. We <br />believe the basis of any consideration for SCO policy should begin and lie within this employee approved <br />agreement. <br /> <br />