My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 20
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/19/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Correspondence - Item 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2026 5:26:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2026 3:24:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 19, 2026 1 <br /> The Honorable Valerie Amezcua RW 44 <br /> Mayor, City of Santa Ana <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 c9a <br /> RE: Self-checkout Ordinance <br /> Dear Mayor Amezcua, <br /> On behalf of the Santa Ana grocery industry, I write with extreme disappointment that as an elected body and as <br /> individual community representatives you have both ignored and failed to recognize the grocery industry or any Santa <br /> Ana grocers in your consideration of Self-checkout(SCO) regulation. <br /> The complete and total lack of communication with grocers leading up to the initial hearing and since the first hearing <br /> is inexcusable. Both California Grocers Association and grocery companies operating in Santa Ana have asked for <br /> individual meetings with the Mayor and Councilmembers before ordinance passage to educate you on impacts and <br /> share alternative policy options. <br /> The asks from grocers and CGA have come in the form of public requests, emails using the city website and phone calls <br /> to publicly listed phone numbers. Only one Councilmember connected with a Santa Ana grocer after several requests, <br /> but it did not occur until the day before the Second Reading. <br /> Ignoring grocery, a critical essential industry, while regulating them with negative consequences is shameful. We had <br /> hope that you would both agree and act on the basic premise of democracy that all voices should be recognized and <br /> heard, even when disagreements occur, with the goal of making balanced and appropriate decisions. <br /> We believe the city and its councilmembers cannot claim respectful and inclusive policy making by ignoring an entire <br /> industry. Sadly, we have all been recently subjected to government systems which regulate without participation, <br /> consideration or respect. However, we never thought that same treatment would occur in California, especially Santa <br /> Ana. <br /> The proposed SCO ordinance has been proven with data and experience to negatively impact employees,consumers <br /> and grocers. Both the operational and enforcement over-regulation have essentially forced grocers to abandoned the <br /> use of SCO.While some approve, it makes it even more difficult for brick-and-mortar grocers to compete with on-line <br /> grocery sales. Consumers prefer the convenience of SCO for smaller and quick purchases. Without SCO for that <br /> convenience, it is easier for them to drive past the store and order from home. <br /> We are saddened by the treatment of the grocery industry by the City of Santa Ana. It has been shown to us again that <br /> reasonable policy discourse is not an option. Our ask is for you to not move forward with the Second Reading and <br /> pause to hear directly from grocers and consider alternative solutions. Thank you for your consideration. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Tim James <br /> Director, Local rnment Relations <br /> California Grocers Association <br /> cc: Councilmembers, Santa Ana City Council <br /> CALIFORNIA GROCERS ASSOCIATION 1 1005 12th Street, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95814 <br /> P: (916) 448-3545 1 F: (916) 448-2793 1 www.cagrocers.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.