My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2026
>
05/19/2026 Regular, Special HA
>
Correspondence - Non Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2026 5:27:37 PM
Creation date
5/13/2026 3:26:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At, <br /> OCCORD <br /> BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER <br /> Dear Mayor Amezcua and Members of the Santa Ana City Council, <br /> On behalf of Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD), <br /> we are submitting this public comment to urge the City of Santa Ana to conduct a full public <br /> audit of the Flock camera program and terminate the City's contract with Flock. <br /> When this contract was approved on May 6, 2025, residents were told there would be <br /> accountability. Council Member Thai Phan moved to approve the contract with the expectation <br /> that the City would receive a report back within one year with clear information on the <br /> installation process, the number of stolen vehicles recovered, the number of missing children or <br /> persons located, the number of crimes solved, and whether the technology was effective <br /> enough to justify renewal. That report never came. A year later, the public still has no answers. <br /> This lack of follow-through is deeply concerning. If the City cannot provide a basic one-year <br /> public update on a surveillance program of this magnitude, residents have little reason to trust <br /> that future safeguards, audit requirements, or privacy protections will actually be enforced. <br /> At minimum, Santa Ana residents deserve clear answers to the following questions: <br /> How many stolen vehicles were recovered directly as a result of Flock cameras? <br /> How ma missing children or missing persons were located directly as a result of Flock <br /> cameras. <br /> How many violent crimes were actually solved directly as a result of Flock cameras? <br /> How many Flock alerts were generated, and how many were inaccurate? <br /> How many residents' license plates and movement patterns were collected? <br /> These questions are not minor administrative details. They go to the heart of whether this <br /> technology is effective, accountable, and safe for the community. Without this information, the <br /> City is asking residents to accept expanded surveillance without evidence, transparency, or <br /> meaningful oversight. <br /> OCCORD, alongside our partners, is especially concerned about the risks this technology poses <br /> to immigrant communities, communities of color, workers, women, queer and trans people, and <br /> residents who exercise their right to speak out against government actions. Across the country <br /> and here in California, Flock and other automated license plate reader systems have raised <br /> serious concerns related to wrongful arrests, inaccurate alerts, unauthorized data sharing, <br /> cybersecurity vulnerabilities, law enforcement misuse, and potential access by federal agencies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.