Laserfiche WebLink
provided in the existing parking structure and some surface parking. The existing <br />office building on the site would be demolished. <br />Commissioner Cribb expressed concerns regarding the architecture for the two <br />high rises; suggested better use of windows, indicated over use of stucco, stated <br />not an inspirational design. He mentioned that details were lacking, needed more <br />explanation from the developer. Commissioner Cribb indicated project resembled <br />the Wycliffe Towers and recommended removing the elliptical balconies. <br />Commissioner Cribb also stated that the penthouse level was not adequately <br />distinguished from the rest of the building and that it should have an appropriate <br />level of architecture and window treatments and other items to really make it stand <br />out as premium space. <br />Commissioner De La Torre inquired as to inspiration for the tower design, plans for <br />the top of the parking structure, playground for children, and suggested that each <br />tower should have its own pool. He also commented the landscaping lacks visual <br />appeal on top level areas and voiced concern with available parking on First <br />Street. Commissioner De La Torre indicated that the use of the towers did not <br />reflect functional use of space; he stated that he did not believe that the objectives <br />for the area were being met with the proposed project. He did not recommend that <br />the applicant start from scratch, but did indicate that the project needed significant <br />changes. <br />Commissioner Betancourt stated that the project design had been described to her <br />as "edgy" and "playful", but she was concerned that, until Santa Ana has an <br />established track record of exceptional architecture, that she felt it would be more <br />appropriate to strive for powerful and elegant design. She indicated that the <br />towers were not exciting in design and that they were not reflective of the important <br />role that Santa Ana plays as Orange County's urban core. She supported the goal <br />of massing the units into two towers in order to preserve more open space. She <br />stated that the penthouses should be articulated on the facade to better <br />differentiate them from the other units and indicate their exclusivity. While she does <br />like the ellipses on the top, the balconies create a visual problem and she felt that <br />the project had an over reliance on stucco, would like more glass. <br />Commissioner Gartner commented that the building model presented did a good <br />job of showing proportions and massing design, but that the renderings did a poor <br />job of communicating what the building would like. He also indicated that the <br />project appeared to have an over reliance on stucco and that, in general, the <br />project lacks "sizzle". <br />Chair Leo expressed concerns with the parking structure design and <br />recommended more extensive use of green screen and other plantings to better <br />screen and articulate the street frontage of the structure. He expressed concerns <br />about the colors chosen for the building as presented in the renderings. <br />H. Recess to Council Chambers (6:19 p.m.) <br />1 <br />Planning Commission Minutes 3 November 13, 2006 <br />