Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 13 TEXT CHANGES <br /> ¦ Proposed Mitigation Measure. Revise mitigation measure i~PiVI4.6-1 to require future <br /> development projects to adhere to the 4~ term Municipal NPDES Stormwater Permit for the <br /> Santa Ana Region of Orange County as adopted on May 11, 2009." (Letter from Orange County <br /> Public Works, dated June 3, 2010, comment OCPW-3.) <br /> Finding. The City finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br /> make this mitigation measure infeasible. <br /> Rationale. Because the majorit<- of the future development of the Transit Zoning Code mad- occur <br /> years in the future, requiring development projects to comply with "current National Pollutant <br /> Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements" ensures compliance with the most up-to- <br /> date standards over a long period of time, since the requirements that are in effect today may differ <br /> in the future. Writing the mitigation measure in this way places the responsibility of complying <br /> with NPDES regulations on future project proponents, regardless of how the regulations change <br /> over time. Therefore, the CitSr will adopt mitigation measure MNI4.6-1 as set forth in the EIR. <br /> Finding Related to Clarifications and Updates to the EIR in Response to Comments <br /> Received Since the Planning Commission Hearing on May 27, 2010 <br /> Finding. Responses to all written and oral comments on the EIR received since the Planning <br /> Commission Hearing on May 27, 2010, merely clarify and amplify the analysis presented in the EIR and <br /> do not trigger the need to recirculate per CEQA Guidelines ~15088.5(b). <br /> Revised Finding on Alternative 5: No Demolition of Agency Properties/Relocate to <br /> <br /> Agency-Owned Infill Sites/Rehabilitate in Place <br /> Description <br /> This alternative would eliminate the demolition on the fourteen parcels within the Station District <br /> currently owned by the City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency that were slated for demolition under <br /> the proposed Developer Project (refer to Figure 5-1 [Demolitions]). Instead, those properties would be <br /> rehabilitated in place or moved to vacant lots and rehabilitated, with the exception of the property <br /> located at 611 N. Minter Street, which would be demolished. Of the properties identified for demolition <br /> on parcels currently owned by the Agency, and those that may potentially be acquired in the future, only <br /> one is currently listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties-the Whitson-Powelson House <br /> located at 501 E. Fifth Street. The remaining houses have primarily been the subject of "windshield" <br /> surveys to determine their potential eligibilit<- for listing as a historic resource. (Refer to EIR Section 4.4 <br /> and Appendix D.) Following a comprehensive historic survey of the properties, the City's Historic <br /> Resources Commission would evaluate all of the structures to determine their eligibility for listing on the <br /> City's Register of Historical Properties and would make recommendations regarding the selection of <br /> houses to be moved and onto which sites they should be moved. Once moved and/or rehabilitated the <br /> houses would then be offered as for-sale affordable housing. The proposed Transit Zoning Code would <br /> remain the same under this Alternative. <br /> In total, this Alternative would provide approximately 145 units (approximately 124 rental units and <br /> approximately 21 for sale units) on the Agency-owned parcels within the Station District. Of these, <br /> approximately 121 units would be rented to low, very-low and extremely-low income households. (Refer <br /> to EIR Appendix J [Alternatives Testing: Financial Analysis], Table 1, Alternatives Analysis.) This is the <br /> City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) EIR 13-3 <br /> <br />