Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RE?L?TI?N N?. 0? 0 <br />A RE?LTI?N ?F THE CITY COUNCIL ?F THE C[TY ?F <br />SANTA ANA APPR?11[N TRAN[T ??NIN CEDE <br />ARCHITECTURAL STYLE U[DELINE AND TRAN[T <br />??NIN CEDE STREET NETVU?RI? CNCEPT <br />?E IT RE?LVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL F THE CITY ?F SANTA ANA A <br />F?LL?I: <br />eotion ? . The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines <br />and declares as fallovus; <br />A. ?n lu[ay ??, ??? ?, the Planning Corrtn?ission held duly noticed public <br />hearing, and by a vote of :? ?Betar?court abstained, Yrarrazval absent <br />voted to recommend that the City Council: <br />? . Adopt a resolution certifying the Final Environmental [r?pact Report <br />No. ?0??-?? prepared for the proposed Transit honing Code ?D <br />84A and 84E} and the proposed redevelopment of properties <br />o?rned by the Santa Ana Redevelopment Agenoy ire the station <br />District collectively, the Proposed Project}? adopting the 1111itigation <br />?I[anitoring and Reporting Program, adopting the CEC?A Facts} <br />Findings and a tater?er?t of overriding Considerations; and <br />approving the Proposal Project. <br />?. Adapt a resolution approving general Plan Annond?nent No. ?? ?- <br />D?, <br />Adopt an ordinance approving an?endn?ents to various zoning <br />provisions of Santa Ana Municipal Code Chapter ?? ??CA No. <br />4. Adopt an ordinance approving the creation of pecif[o Development <br />No. ??4, approving the rezoning of properties fror? various zones to <br />specific ?evelopnnent No. S4} repealing pecifio Development No, <br />?, ?, 47 and ??, and amending the height exer?ption areas neap <br />AAA No. ?0??-g9?. <br />t Adopt a resolution approving Transit caning Code Architectural <br />ty[e guidelines and Transit honing Code street Netuvor[t <br />Concepts. <br />B, The City Council of the City of Santa Aria held a duly noticed public hearing <br />on the above said actions forthe Transit honing Code peci?c Development <br />District LSD-4} on June 7, ?g 0, and t that time considered all testimony, <br />Resa?ut?o? No, ??? ?-? <br />Page ? ?f