My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19H - RFP - RIGHT OF WAY SRVS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
10/18/2010
>
19H - RFP - RIGHT OF WAY SRVS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:58:35 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 11:00:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19H
Date
10/18/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Staffing & Project Organization - 30% <br />Qualifications of project staff, particularly key personnel and especially the Project <br />Manager; key personnel's level of involvement in performing related work cited in <br />"Qualifications of the Firm" section; logic of project organization; adequacy of labor <br />commitment; concurrence in the restrictions on changes in key personnel. <br />3. Work Plan - 20% <br />Depth of Consultant's understanding of City's requirements and overall quality of work <br />plan; logic, clarity and specificity of work plan; appropriateness of labor distribution <br />among the tasks; ability to meet the project deadline; reasonableness of proposed <br />schedule; utility of suggested technical or procedural innovations. <br />4. Cost and Price - 20% <br />Reasonableness and affordability of the proposed hourly rates and other direct costs <br />compared with other offers received. Adequacy of data in support of figures quoted; <br />reasonableness of individual task budgets; basis on which prices are quoted. <br />EVALUATION PROCEDURE <br />An evaluation committee will be appointed to review all proposals received for this RFP. The <br />committee is comprised of City staff and may include outside personnel. The committee <br />members will evaluate the written proposals using criteria identified in Consultant Selection <br />above. A list of top ranked proposals, firms within a competitive range, will be developed based <br />upon averaging of the committee members' scores for each proposal. <br />During the evaluation period, the City may interview some or all of the proposing firms. <br />At any time during the evaluation process, and before or after selection for award, the City may <br />negotiate contract terms with some or all Consultants, and expressly reserves the right to <br />negotiate with several Consultants simultaneously, and thereafter to award a contract to the <br />Consultant or Consultants presenting the most favorable terms to the City. Consultants may <br />also be asked to submit a Best and Final Offer (BAFO). The BAFO will include, but not <br />necessarily be limited to, additional information, confirmation or clarification of issues, and <br />submission of a final cost/price proposal. <br />At the conclusion of the evaluation process, the evaluation committee will recommend to the <br />appropriate Board Committee, the Consultant with the highest final ranking or a short list of top <br />ranked Consultants within the competitive range The Board Committee will review the evaluation <br />committee's recommendation and forward its decision to the full Board of Directors for final <br />action. <br />AWARD <br />The City Council will consider the recommendation of staff and may approve contract award or <br />Page 8 of 48 <br />19H-10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.