2008-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of . privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. Due to the configuration of the lot and existing development surrounding the project site, denial of the variance would deprive the property owner the privilege of constructing a quality commercial building. Although the site does not meet the required commercial lot size and street frontage requirement, the applicant is unable to provide additional lot area as the surrounding properties are currently developed. The property owner was unable to acquire additional parcels to include within the project. Additionally, the site abutting to the west was developed with Variance No. 1987-07 to allow development on an undersized lot and can remain indefinitely. Policy 2.8 of the Land Use Element encourages the rehabilitation of commercial properties and capital investment within the City. The applicant has fully utilized the existing area and provided a high quality office project that will replace a former bar. ii. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The granting of the variance would allow the property owner the opportunity to develop a quality project on the site. Not allowing the variance would require that the property remain in the current condition until the property owner acquires one of the adjoining properties. This would create a visual blight for the adjoining residential and commercial properties. Additionally, the unoccupied building can create safety issues for adjoining properties. Policy 2.7 of the Land Use Element emphasizes supporting developments that create a business environment that is safe and attractive. iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. Resolution No. 2008-06 Page 2 of 9