My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2010-08-16
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
08/16/2010
>
FULL PACKET_2010-08-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2016 3:13:06 PM
Creation date
10/19/2010 4:44:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/16/2010
Destruction Year
2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />JULY 2010 FIRST STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />Sediment Control BMPs to prevent soil erosion during soil disturbance activities. Implementation of <br />the Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs, as specified in Mitigation Measure WQ-1, would prevent <br />adverse soil erosion and subsequent siltation impacts during construction. <br />Existing runoff from the project site sheet flows into the curb and gutters and then into catch basins. <br />The street widening and bridge replacement would not alter the drainage pattern on or off-site and <br />runoff would continue to follow the same drainage pattern as the existing conditions. The Proposed <br />project would increase the impervious surface area by approximately 0.30 ac compared to the existing <br />roadway facility. Any increase in volume and velocity of runoff from the 0.30 ac increase in <br />impervious surface area would not be substantial and would be conveyed to the existing downstream <br />conveyance channels which are engineered, hardened and regularly maintained. Project runoff would <br />not be directed to unpaved areas prone to erosion. The replacement of the bridge piers and nosing <br />would occur within the Santa Ana River, which is concrete -lined within the project area and not <br />subject to erosion. Therefore, the modifications within the Santa Ana River would not increase <br />erosion. For these reasons, erosion and siltation impacts as a result of changes to existing drainage <br />patterns would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. <br />D. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the <br />alteration of the course of stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface <br />runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on or off-site? <br />Less than significant impact. As discussed above in VIII.C., the proposed project would not alter <br />the existing drainage pattern of the site. The project would increase the impervious surface area by <br />approximately 0.30 ac compared to the existing roadway facility. However, the rate and volume of <br />surface water runoff from the facility would not increase substantially and would not cause flooding <br />in the area. Therefore, impacts related to capacity of the existing stormwater drainage system would <br />be less than significant. <br />E. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned <br />stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted run-off? <br />Less than significant impact with mitigation. The proposed project would not create or contribute <br />runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or <br />provide substantial sources of polluted runoff. The Proposed project would increase the impervious <br />surface area by approximately 0.30 ac compared to the existing roadway facility. This small increase <br />in impervious area is not large enough to exceed the capacity of the existing storm drains. However, <br />an increase in impervious area could result in an increase in pollutant loading to receiving waters. As <br />specified in Mitigation Measure WQ-2, Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment BMPs would be <br />incorporated into the project design to treat pollutants of concern in runoff from the project site prior <br />to discharge to the City storm drain system. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure <br />WQ-2, impacts related to addition of polluted run-off to the stormwater drainage system would be <br />reduced to less than significant. <br />F. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />07/25/10 «TA\DMJ0701\MND\4.0 Environmental Analysis.doc» <br />20A-74 <br />4-23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.