My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-67
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2005
>
2005-67
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:55:26 PM
Creation date
10/20/2010 2:31:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
VA05-25
Date
8/22/2005
Notes
206 N Olive St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found <br />• to deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at <br />variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this <br />chapter. <br />There are special circumstances applicable to the subject <br />property. The subject site is located on the northeast corner <br />of Olive and Second Streets, which is a contained site <br />surrounded by existing residential and commercial <br />developments. The setback, landscaping reductions and <br />loading space waiver are necessary due to the limited lot <br />size and configuration. This variance will allow the applicant <br />the ability to use the property in a manner that is consistent <br />with similar surrounding commercial and professional uses. <br />2. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation <br />and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. <br />The granting of the variance will preserve the property <br />owner's ability to develop the property with awell-designed <br />office building that is consistent with the Professional (P) <br />zoning district. <br />• 3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental <br />to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property <br />because the project has been designed to preserve the <br />character of the surrounding neighborhood: The facility will <br />contribute to the general well being of the community by <br />providing professional service to residents and visitors as <br />well as enhancing the economic stability of the area by <br />converting a vacant lot into a vital, active commercial <br />development. <br />4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan of the City. <br />The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan of the City since the proposed office building <br />was designed in conformance with City Zoning, <br />Development, and General Plan requirements. <br />D. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the <br />California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt <br />from further review pursuant to Section 15303 and 15305. The Class 3 <br />exemption allows the construction of small structures and the Class 5 <br />Resolution No. 2005-67 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.