2003-48 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• for another use due to differences in time between the primary utilization of parking as between such uses? As conditioned, the YMCA building will only be utilized when the Cathedral Parish, the highest parking generator on the site, is not being utilized. This is consistent with the proposed operation plan of the new parish. ii. Will the effect of granting the exception substantially increase difficulties of vehicular maneuverability ortraffic congestion? As conditioned and designed, the on and off-site circulation will not be impacted by the granting of shared parking between the on-site uses of the property. Section 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study and the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program prepared with respect to this Project. As a result of this consideration and the evidence presented at the hearing on this matter, the Planning Commission has determined that, as required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, a mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program adequately addresses the expected environmental • impacts of this Project. On the basis of this review, the Planning Commission finds that there is no evidence from which it can be fairly argued that the Project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Planning Commission hereby certifies and approves the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring program and directs that the Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the manner required by law. Pursuant to Title XIV, California Code of Regulations ("CCR") § 735.5(c)(1), the Planning Commission has determined that, after considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have the potential for any adverse effect on wildlife resources or the ecological habitat upon which wildlife resources depend. The proposed project exists in an urban environment characterized by paved concrete, roadways, surrounding buildings and human activity. Therefore, pursuant to Fish and Game Code § 711.2 and Title XIV, CCR § 735.5(a)(3), the payment of Fish and Game Department filing fees is not required in conjunction with this project. Section 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana after conducting the public hearing hereby, approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-35 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein and approves Minor Exception 2003-10 as conditioned in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. ADOPTED this 22nd day of December, 2003 by the following vote: Resolution No. 2003-48 Page 3 of 4