Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the <br />public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of a minor exception will not be detrimental or <br />injurious to the surrounding properties or create an <br />appearance that is aesthetically incompatible with the <br />surrounding properties. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element <br />states that projects must exhibit a functional, comfortable scale <br />in relation to the neighborhood. The neighborhood will be <br />visually improved with the type and style of the fence. <br />4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan of the City. <br />The approved minor exception will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan, as it does not have a negative impact on the <br />goals and policies expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of <br />the Urban Design Element Policy Plan is to encourage <br />residential alterations that are consistent with the architectural <br />character of the neighborhood. The front yard fence is <br />compatible with the character and style of the existing <br />neighborhood <br />• <br />D. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 03-193 will be filed for <br />this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. <br />Section 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana after conducting <br />the public hearing hereby approves Minor Exception No. 2003-07 as conditioned in Exhibit <br />"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. <br />ADOPTED this 22"d day of October, 2003. <br />~~--~ " <br />Kenneth Adams <br />Zoning Administrator <br />APPROVED AS TO FORM: <br />Joseph W. Fletcher, City Attorney <br />~_.. <br />By: ~ ~ ,, <br />Kylee O. tto <br />• Deputy ty Attorney <br />Resolution No. 2003-43 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />