My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-19
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2003
>
2003-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:55:47 PM
Creation date
10/27/2010 3:13:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
ME03-05
Date
5/21/2003
Notes
2231 S Baker St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 2. That the granting of a variance or minor exception is necessary for <br />the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property <br />rights. <br />The approval of this minor exception will allow the property <br />owners to enjoy the use of their property to accommodate the <br />unique needs of an individual family member. The expansion <br />of a bedroom at the front of the residence is necessary due to <br />the current usage of this room for the special needs of this <br />individual. The expansion to the front of the residence allows <br />the special use needs to continue with minimal internaption. <br />3. That the granting of a variance or minor exception will not be <br />materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding <br />property. <br />The granting of minor exception will not be detrimental or <br />injurious to the surrounding properties. The addition will be <br />aesthetically compatible with the existing structure and with <br />surrounding properties. The encroachment of approximately <br />10 percent into the prevailing front yard setback will not have a <br />significant impact on the existing neighborhood character and <br />will provide architectural treatment typically found throughout <br />• the area. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element states that <br />projects must exhibit a functional, comfortable scale in relation <br />to the neighborhood. The addition will accomplish this goal. <br />4. That the granting of a variance or minor exception will not adversely <br />affect the General Plan of the City. <br />The requested minor exception will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan, as it will be consistent with the goals and <br />policies expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of the Urban <br />Design Element Policy Plan is to encourage residential <br />alterations that are consistent with the architectural character <br />of the neighborhood. The addition will be compatible with the <br />existing neighborhood and with the existing single-family <br />residence. The encroachment into the front yard setback will <br />not significantly impact the prevailing setback and has been <br />designed to be consistent with the architectural elements of <br />the existing residence. <br />D. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 03-097 will be filed for <br />this project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. <br />Section 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting <br />• the public hearing, hereby approves Minor Exception No. 2003-05. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.