2005-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• pumps and building, it is infeasible to provide the required landscaped setback. The applicant has provided additional landscaping at the northeast corner of the site and within the interior of the project to mitigate the reduced setback. Therefore, due to the size of the lot, the strict application of the zoning ordinance would deprive the subject property of privileges not otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. The granting of the variance for a reduction in landscaped setbacks will preserve the property owners ability to develop the property with a use that will benefit the community by providing gasoline and food service to commuters, individuals who work in the area and motorists utilizing the SR-55 freeway corridor. iii. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. The project will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property as proposed. The project will enhance the economic stability of the area by allowing the commercial component, thereby identifying the site as a vital, active commercial development. Therefore, the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. iv. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The granting of the a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City since the proposed service station and convenience store have been designed in conformance with City zoning, development and General Plan requirements. Resolution No. 2005-12 Page 5 of 7