2004-33 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. Will the proposed use under the circumstances of the particular • case be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity? The proposed church will be detrimental to the general welfare and safety of the surrounding residents. Although the proposed church is in compliance with Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code with respect to parking, setbacks and landscaping, additional traffic and noise impacts from the proposed project are anticipated which will be detrimental to the welfare of surrounding residents. 3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? The proposed church will adversely affect the future economic development of properties surrounding the area since properties directly adjacent to the church will be less desirable to purchase due to the additional traffic, noise and littering problems caused by the church. 4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions specified in Chapter 41 for such use. The proposed use will not be in compliance with the • applicable sections of Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code since the proposed use will not satisfy the standards for granting of a conditional use permit as outlined in Section 41-638(1) (i) through (iii) and (v). 5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any specific plan of the City? The granting of the conditional use permit will adversely affect the General Plan of the City since it does not satisfy policies contained with the Land Use Element. Policy 3.1 which states "support development which provides a positive contribution to neighborhood character and identity" will not be satisfied by the project due to the increase in traffic, noise and litter within the neighborhood. Overcrowded street parking, excessive noise and litter are signs of neighborhood dilapidation, which is detrimental to the quality of life and attractiveness of a project. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby, denies Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-17. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not limited to: the Staff reports and exhibits attached thereto; and the public testimony all of which are • incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2004-33 Page 2 of 3