My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-07
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
PLANNING COMMISION
>
2004
>
2004-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:55:31 PM
Creation date
11/1/2010 3:59:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
ME04-02
Date
4/7/2004
Notes
1310 S Birch
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />~~ <br />3. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to <br />the public welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The granting of a minor exception will be detrimental or <br />injurious to the surrounding properties due to an appearance <br />that is incompatible with the existing fences of the surrounding <br />properties. Goal 2.7 of the Urban Design Element states that <br />projects must exhibit a functional, comfortable scale in relation <br />to the neighborhood. Although the fence materials are <br />compatible with the existing residence, the proposed fence will <br />stand out from the existing fences that are constructed to <br />current standards. <br />4. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General <br />Plan of the City. <br />The requested minor exception will adversely affect the <br />General Plan, as it has a negative impact on the goals and <br />policies expressed in that document. Goal 3.5 of the Urban <br />Design Element Policy Plan is to encourage residential <br />alterations that are consistent with the architectural character <br />of the neighborhood. Twenty-eight inch wide pilasters are <br />inconsistent with the existing neighborhood, as the majority of <br />the surrounding properties do not have wide pilasters in the <br />front yard setback. A similar fence could be constructed with <br />the required 16-inch pilasters and incorporate the proposed <br />architectural style of the wall. <br />D. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed <br />project is Statutorily Exempt. No further environmental review is needed. <br />Environmental Review No. 2004-48 will be filed for this project. <br />Section 2. The Zoning Administrator of the City of Santa Ana after conducting <br />the public hearing hereby denies Minor Exception No. 2004-02. This decision is based <br />upon the evidence submitted at the abovesaid hearing, which includes but not is not <br />limited to: the Request for Zoning Administrator Action dated April 7, 2004 and exhibits <br />attached thereto; and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this <br />reference. <br />ADOPTED this 7th day of April, 2004. <br />~/5,~~ <br />Kenneth Adams <br />Zoning Administrator <br />• <br />Resolution No. 2004-07 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.