Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Federal law exempts local jurisdictions from regulating health <br />related issues as these issues are covered under Federal <br />laws. However, the proposed facility will be in compliance <br />with both the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) <br />and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations. <br />3. Will the proposed use adversely affect the present economic stability <br />or future economic development of properties surrounding the area? <br />The proposed monopine, in conjunction with the proposed <br />landscaping, will be compatible with the surrounding area and <br />will not adversely affect the economic viability in the area. <br />The stealth appearance will be the major solution to <br />maintaining and increasing the economic stability for this <br />industrial area. <br />4. Will the proposed use comply with the regulations and conditions <br />specified in Chapter 41 for such use? <br />The cellular facility has been designed to comply with the <br />regulations and conditions identified in Chapter 41 of the <br />Santa Ana Municipal Code for a major wireless facility. <br />• <br />5. Will the proposed use adversely affect the General Plan or any <br />specific plan of the City? <br />The proposed monopine facility will not adversely affect the <br />General Plan as cellular facilities that are designed to be <br />compatible with the surrounding environment are consistent <br />with the goals and objectives of the Industrial (IND) General <br />Plan designation. <br />E. This project was reviewed in accordance with the Guidelines for the <br />California Environmental Quality Act. The recommendation is exempt <br />from further review pursuant to Section 15303. This Class 3 exemption <br />allows in-fill developments for the construction and location of limited <br />numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Categorical Exemption <br />Environmental Review No. 2009-151 will be filed for this project. <br />• <br />Section 2. The Planning Commission after conducting the public hearing hereby <br />approves Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-02 as conditioned in Exhibit "A" attached <br />hereto and incorporated herein. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at <br />the above said hearing, which includes but is not limited to: the Request for Planning <br />Commission Action dated April 12, 2010 and exhibits attached thereto; and the public <br />testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. <br />Resolution No. 2010-06 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />