Laserfiche WebLink
Which Technologies Are Most Suitable? <br />— <br />0% <br />29.8% <br />33.9% <br />27.0% <br />29.5% <br />Number of residents within a 1/4 mile <br />GOAL$lSBDCRREM <br />PERSONAL <br />RAPT <br />TRANSIT <br />� <br />MONORAIL <br />Desd <br />MNJl.71RlE <br />CO�� <br />RAL <br />LIGHTRAL <br />Bus <br />7ROLLJIVKA �� <br />LIYABILI TYfACCESSIBYJTY_ <br />42 <br />thousands) <br />UNITS <br />Number of employees within a 1/4 mile <br />8TRBEICAR <br />Does the project promote livability <br />walking distance of proposed alignment (in <br />26 <br />27 <br />27 <br />26 <br />25 <br />andvA&abdW. Does it utilize <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />clean furls? Does it reduce auto <br />dependency? <br />High <br />Would serve transit-supportive land use <br />Low <br />Medium -High <br />High <br />Medium -High <br />Medium <br />Will be perceived as a significant long -term <br />PROVM FEASIBILITY: <br />Public investment in infrastructure by <br />Potential investors/developers <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />High <br />9 <br />High <br />High <br />Is the technology proven in revenue <br />Rile <br />Ne <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />service in the US? <br />3rd <br />Top Technology Being Considered <br />❖ Modern Streetcar <br />— Runs in street traffic or in exclusive guideway <br />AFFORDAMLITY: <br />— Typical Vehicle Capacity: 50 seated, up to 100 standing <br />Reduced Set of Alternatives <br />❖ No Build Alternative <br />— Depicts what happens if project is not built <br />Can the project be e nted at <br />already been funded and committed through the year 2035. <br />a cost ba sed <br />treasonable' a <br />b d on <br />No <br />You <br />Yes <br />Yss <br />Y es <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Possible, known funding sources? <br />ACCESS a rTY: <br />Does the prciect provide the <br />required level of accessibility ? <br />Does it address identified travel <br />1N <br />No <br />Ne <br />no <br />Ne <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />markets and creeds? <br />COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCFI <br />ENVIRONMENTAL STEIVAROSHIP- <br />Does the project avoid major right- <br />Ile <br />me <br />No <br />No <br />jle <br />Ile <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />all y inipects ? Can it operate in <br />Yes <br />existing lanes? <br />How Well Does Each Alignment Perform? <br />Alternative r provides service to City's <br />adopted transit corridors <br />0% <br />29.8% <br />33.9% <br />27.0% <br />29.5% <br />Number of residents within a 1/4 mile <br />walking distance of proposed alignment (in <br />43 <br />43 <br />45 <br />42 <br />42 <br />thousands) <br />Number of employees within a 1/4 mile <br />walking distance of proposed alignment (in <br />26 <br />27 <br />27 <br />26 <br />25 <br />thousands) <br />Would promotes principles of "Livability" <br />Logy <br />Low <br />High 9 <br />High <br />High <br />Would serve transit-supportive land use <br />Low <br />Medium -High <br />High <br />Medium -High <br />Medium <br />Will be perceived as a significant long -term <br />Public investment in infrastructure by <br />Potential investors/developers <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />High <br />9 <br />High <br />High <br />Total estimated capital cost <br />Lowy <br />Lowy <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />Medium <br />RECOMMENDED RANKING <br />5th <br />4th <br />1st <br />2nd <br />3rd <br />Top Technology Being Considered <br />❖ Modern Streetcar <br />— Runs in street traffic or in exclusive guideway <br />— Electrically powered through single overhead wire <br />— Typical Vehicle Capacity: 50 seated, up to 100 standing <br />Reduced Set of Alternatives <br />❖ No Build Alternative <br />— Depicts what happens if project is not built <br />— No further transportation improvements beyond what has <br />already been funded and committed through the year 2035. <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 19 OCTOBER 18, 2010 <br />1 0A -19 <br />