My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2005
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
04-11-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:57:34 PM
Creation date
11/16/2010 4:27:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
4/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Renzo Zecchetto, reviewed the proposed lighting features in conjunction with <br />police restrictions. <br />Vice Chair Leo commented on the mitigated traffic issues and thanked the <br />developer for their efforts. <br />~J <br /> <br />i <br />Chair Mondo made the following comments: <br />• Revise mitigation measure N6 to modify construction hours on Saturdays <br />to not start earlier than 8:00 a.m. <br />• Park in-lieu fee -neighborhood parks are heavily used and have program <br />schedules more like regional parks. Would like in-lieu funding to be <br />expended at local parks (Sandpointe, Lillie King, and Bomo Koral). Chief <br />Assistant City Attorney Kaufman will advise. <br />• Commented on traffic mitigations, major impacts for proposed lanes to <br />SR55/MacArthur Boulevard/SR22. <br />• Pedestrian circulation as depicted in EIR is substantially different than <br />what was most recently provided to the Planning Commission. Will <br />recommend to Council that all traffic mitigation measures be implemented <br />• Lake is not accessible enough to pedestrians. <br />• Dynamic lake features, what is included and/or excluded <br />• Enhanced landscaping, provide more detail <br />• Art pieces along the promenade, need specific details <br />• Provide information on future new access points of improvements -North <br />Tower down to the lake (lower condos access) <br />• Main/Mac Arthur entry for residents only, considering "restricted" entry <br />• Landscape plan to identify trees (number, growth, longevity, <br />hardscape/softscape) <br />• Office space, is it long term for lease or sale? Does builder use it? <br />• Need detail for footbridge from lobby to amenity deck, also equipped with <br />elevator, avoid "dead space". <br />• Page 58 stated no construction vehicle on site; where are vehicles going <br />to park? <br />• Interior management, provide more detail <br />• Consider an opportunity to provide creative new city entry monumentation <br />that ties in with the project. <br />G. Recess to Council Chambers (6:44) <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />3 <br />April 11, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.