Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION: Adopt a resolution: <br />1. Add Planning Condition 4 stating that the non-permitted rooftop sign <br /> shall be removed prior to issuance of any building permit(s). <br />2. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (B1) for Sign No. B; <br />3. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (C1) for Sign No. C; <br />4. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (D1) for Sign No. D; <br />5. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (D2) for Sign No. D; <br />6. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (D3) for Sign No. D; <br />7. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (D4) for Sign No. D; <br />• <br />8. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (D5) for Sign No. D; <br />9. Approving Variance No. 2004-10 (E1) for Sign No. E. <br />MOTION: Nalle SECOND: Lutz <br />VOTE: AYES: De La Torre, Leo, Lutz, Mondo, Nalle, Sinclair <br />(6) <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSTAIN: None (0) <br />ABSENT: Cribb (1) <br />F. NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT REVIEW NO.2004-18 <br />(Continued by Planning Commission: November 22, 2004 to December 13, 2004) <br />Filed by Blanca Frey to allow construction of a residential addition in the Specific <br />Development 40 zone at 922 South Ross Street. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Adopt a resolution approving Neighborhood Project Review No. 2004-18. <br />Senior Planner, Sergio Klotz presented the staff report and recommendation. <br />Ginelle Hardy representing Heninger Park Association noted approval of project. <br />Mr. Kaufman explained that the prior failure of the motion to approve (3:3 tie <br />vote) did not constitute a denial of the project and that the Chair has the <br />discretion to declare an impasse, as Chair Mondo did, and offered a continuance <br />to the applicant. <br />MOTION: Adopt a resolution approving Neighborhood Project Review No. <br />2004-18. <br />MOTION: De La Torre SECOND: Nalle <br />VOTE: AYES: De La Torre, Leo, Mondo, Nalle (4) <br />NOES: Cribb, Lutz, Sinclair (3) <br />ABSTAIN: None (0) <br />ABSENT: None (0} <br />WORK STUDY SESSION <br />G. NEXUS MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT <br />(Jay Trevino) <br />Mr. Trevino reported on the status of the project and provided the Commission <br />with an overview of the project consideration process and major milestones, <br />. including the EIR, public review period for the draft environmental document and <br />Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) involvement. <br />John Kaliski, the City's architectural review consultant, provided an overview of <br />his comments on the conceptual master plan. He commented that the applicant <br />has made significant progress in responding to staff's comments. <br />Mr. Kaliski did note that the recent changes in conceptual plans have created <br />inconsistencies within the plans themselves. He stated that staff's review would <br />Planning Commission Minutes 3 December 13, 2004 <br />