My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-2002
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
07-22-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:58:00 PM
Creation date
11/19/2010 2:45:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
7/22/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * * <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2002-03, AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. <br />2002-07, AND MINOR EXCEPTION NO.2002-03 (Ann Ni) <br />Filed by Arnel Development Company to request a General Plan Amendment from <br />Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) to General Commercial (GC) and a zone <br />change from Professional (P) to General Commercial (C2) in order to construct a retail <br />development and a Minor Exception to allow a reduction in the minimum parking <br />requirement at 431 N. Tustin Avenue. <br />PUBLISHED IN THE REGISTER: July 12, 2002 <br />PUBLICLY NOTICED: July 12, 2002 <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Recommend that the City Council: <br />1. Approve and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2001-147. <br />2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002-03. <br />3. Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2002-07. <br />4. Adopt a resolution approving Minor Exception No. 2002-03. <br />Ann Ni, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and recommendation. Discussion <br />was held regarding signage and traffic. Commissioner Richardson requested <br />information on the size of the potential signage for the project. The item was laid on the <br />desk to allow staff to calculate the allowable area for signage. Following discussion of <br />Item 2,Ms. Ni advised that the signs will be based on the size of each tenant space and <br />would range from 20-25 feet. The applicant would normally apply for a sign program but <br />the proposed signage for the project could be brought to the Commission for review. <br />Discussion held regarding inclusion of a water element. Rudy Baldoni, representing the <br />applicant, advised that the scope had not been finalized but that they would work with <br />staff to include a water element in the project. Discussion held regarding potential <br />tenants. <br />Motion to add Planning Commission review of project signage and a water <br />element to fhe conditions of Minor Exception No. 2002-03, and recommend that <br />the City Council: <br />1. Approve and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2001-147. <br />2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2002-03. <br />3. Adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2002-07. <br />4. Adopt a resolution approving Minor Exception No. 2002-03. <br />MOTION: Richardson SECOND: Doughty <br />VOTE: AYES: Cribb, Doughty, Leo, Nalle, Richardson, Verino (6) <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSENT: Mondo (1) <br />GRAND AVENUE WIDENING DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 1998-01 <br />(David Biondolillo) <br />Filed by the City of Santa Ana to receive public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact <br />Report for the proposed Grand Avenue Widening Project located on North Grand Avenue <br />between Walnut and Seventeenth Streets. <br />PUBLISHED IN THE REGISTER: July 12, 2002 <br />PUBLICLY NOTICED: July 12, 2002 <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 July 22, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.