My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25B - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES THE PLANNING CENTER
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2010
>
12/06/2010
>
25B - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES THE PLANNING CENTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:56:52 PM
Creation date
12/2/2010 1:05:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25B
Date
12/6/2010
Destruction Year
2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 9, 2010 <br />Page 5 <br />City's Noise Element and criteria identified in the California Administrative Code Title 24 (interior noise standards) for <br />noise compatibility. Noise modeling datasheets will be included as an appendix to the PEIR. <br />TASK 2 - INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION <br />The Initial Study (IS) will include brief written responses for all items included on the standard Appendix G checklist, <br />including the new thresholds that became effective March 18, 2010. Each response will explain the basis for the <br />assessment of No Impact, Less Than Significant Impact, Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated, or <br />Potentially Significant Impact; clearly indicate why a particular issue would not result in a significant impact and does <br />not require further evaluation; and identify those issues that require further analysis in a PEIR. Given the City's decision <br />to prepare a PEIR, it is assumed for the purpose of this proposal that checklist responses will consist mainly of short <br />statements that lead to further analysis in the PEIR. A complete list of references used to prepare the 15 will be <br />provided. <br />A Notice of Preparation (NOP) will be prepared with the IS that clearly identifies the time period, contact person, and <br />address for submitting responses on the IS. A copy of the IS will be attached to the NOP to explain the preliminary <br />scope of issues to be included in the PEIR for distribution by the City. <br />Deliverable(s): <br />- Screencheck IS/NOP (5 review hard copies per screencheck) <br />- IS/NOP (1 single-sided reproducible IS/NbP, 1 CD copy in MS Word) <br />- Distribution of the IS/NOP via certified mail <br />TASK 3 - SLOPING MEETING <br />The Planning Centerwill assist the City in organizing and conducting one public scoping meeting to present the CEQA <br />process and solicit comments about the scope and content of the PEIR for the Harbor Corridor Vision Plan project. At <br />the public scoping meeting, we will be prepared to discuss the environmental review in connection with the proposed <br />project and respond to specific questions, as desired by the City. <br />We recommend that the scoping meeting be noticed in the NOP and held as soon as possible following the release of <br />the NOP. A summary of the comments received at the public scoping meeting will be included in the PEIR as an <br />attachment to include community input with this official environmental document. <br />Deliverables <br />Attendance/participation in scoping meeting (Project Director and/or PEIR project manager) <br />- Scoping meeting handouts <br />TASK 4 - SCREENCHECK DRAFT PROGRAM EIR <br />The Planning Center will prepare a Screencheck PEIR based on the environmental topic sections disclosed in the I5. The <br />PEIR will be clearly written and will avoid the use of technical jargon so that the document is easily understood. If <br />technical terms need to be introduced for accuracy, they will be clearly defined. The analysis of issues will be thorough <br />yet concise. Each topical section of the document will 1) describe existing environmental conditions, 2) define the <br />criteria by which impacts will be determined to be significant, 3) determine the environmental changes that would <br />result from the project, 4) evaluate the significance of those changes with respect to the impact significance criteria, <br />5) define mitigation measures to reduce or avoid all potentially significant adverse impacts, and b) provide a <br />conclusion as to whether significant impacts would remain, even after successful implementation of recommended <br />mitigation measures and project design features. <br />25B-15
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.