Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 01-42 <br />Page 4 <br />• EXHIBIT "B" <br />FINDINGS OF FACT FOR VARIANCE NO. 2001-06 <br />A. That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, <br />including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application <br />of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive the subject property of privileges not <br />otherwise at variance with the intent and purpose of the provisions of this chapter. <br />Due to the relative size of the lot and the setback of the building from the <br />street, the installation of additional wall signage will allow Target the ability <br />to identify new uses and services available within the store. The variance <br />will also allow Target the ability to use the property in a manner that is <br />consistent with similar sized uses. <br />No special circumstances exist on the site that deprives the site of <br />privileges for the monument signs. Other similar sized projects along the <br />Seventeenth Street corridor have installed monument signage that is in <br />compliance with the Sign Code. <br />B. That the granting of a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of <br />one or more substantial property rights. <br />• The granting of the variance for secondary signage will allow the tenant <br />the ability to identify a new activity that will be provided within the store. <br />The variance for monument signage is not necessary to preserve property <br />rights as the tenant will still maintain the ability to install monument signs, <br />therefore allowing the ability to identify the business. <br />C. That the granting of a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public <br />welfare or injurious to surrounding property. <br />The secondary signage will not be detrimental to the surrounding area <br />as a condition of approval has been added that wi11 limit the amount of <br />secondary signage allowed on the site. This will assist in minimizing the <br />visual clutter found on structures with multiple wall signs. <br />The granting of a variance for the monument signage may be detrimental <br />to the area by allowing excessively large signage on the site that may <br />contribute to adverse aesthetic impacts along the corridor. <br />D. That the granting of a variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the <br />City. <br />The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the City's General <br />• Plan in any way as the land use designation of General Commercial (GC) <br />allows signage in conjunction with retail uses in the land use designation. <br />